Rewers M, Shetterly S M, Baxter J, Marshall J A, Hamman R F
Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver.
Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Jun 15;135(12):1321-30. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116243.
The prevalence of coronary heart disease was studied in 1984-1988 in 1,092 individuals with normal glucose tolerance, 173 individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, and 429 individuals with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, who were age 25-74 years and were from a biethnic community in the San Luis Valley, Colorado. Glucose tolerance was classified using the World Health Organization criteria, and coronary heart disease prevalence was assessed using the Rose Questionnaire and a resting electrocardiogram. Compared with normal glucose tolerance, coronary heart disease was significantly more prevalent in diabetic non-Hispanic white women (odds ratio (OR) for all end points combined = 3.2, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.8-5.5) and men (OR = 1.9, 95% Cl 1.1-3.3) and in diabetic Hispanic women (OR = 1.7, 95% Cl 1.1-2.5), but not men (OR = 1.0, 95% Cl 0.6-1.7). Among diabetic men, the prevalence of possible myocardial infarction was lower in Hispanics than in non-Hispanic whites (OR = 0.4, 95% Cl 0.2-0.7). Similar patterns of coronary heart disease were observed in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance. The paradoxically low prevalence of coronary heart disease in Hispanics with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, especially men, may be due to unknown protective factors, increased case fatality, or competing mortality in this group.
1984年至1988年期间,对来自科罗拉多州圣路易斯谷一个双种族社区、年龄在25至74岁之间的1092名糖耐量正常个体、173名糖耐量受损个体以及429名非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病个体的冠心病患病率进行了研究。根据世界卫生组织标准对糖耐量进行分类,并使用罗斯问卷和静息心电图评估冠心病患病率。与糖耐量正常者相比,糖尿病非西班牙裔白人女性(所有终点合并的比值比(OR)=3.2,95%置信区间(Cl)1.8-5.5)和男性(OR = 1.9,95% Cl 1.1-3.3)以及糖尿病西班牙裔女性(OR = 1.7,95% Cl 1.1-2.5)的冠心病患病率显著更高,但西班牙裔男性(OR = 1.0,95% Cl 0.6-1.7)并非如此。在糖尿病男性中,西班牙裔可能发生心肌梗死的患病率低于非西班牙裔白人(OR = 0.4,95% Cl 0.2-0.7)。在糖耐量受损个体中也观察到了类似的冠心病模式。非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病西班牙裔个体,尤其是男性,冠心病患病率反常地低,可能是由于该群体中存在未知的保护因素、病死率增加或竞争性死亡率所致。