Suppr超能文献

印度东部八个民族群体的遗传结构与亲缘关系:基于22个多态性DNA位点

Genetic structure and affinity among eight ethnic populations of Eastern India: based on 22 polymorphic DNA loci.

作者信息

Kashyap V K, Chattopadhyay P, Dutta R, Vasulu T S

机构信息

DNA Typing Unit, Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Calcutta, W. Bengal, India.

出版信息

Am J Hum Biol. 2004 May-Jun;16(3):311-27. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20026.

Abstract

The nature and extent of genetic variation at 22 polymorphic DNA loci, belonging to three distinct classes, especially, 12 STR loci (D3S1358, vWA, FGA, D5S818, D13S317, D7S820, D8S1179, D21S11, D18S51, HPRTB, F13B, LPL), four VNTR loci (D1S7, D4S139, D5S110, D17S79), and six coding loci (HLDQA1, LDLR, GYPA, HBGG, D7S8, GC) were investigated among eight population groups of West Bengal and Manipur regions of India. Of these, two groups from West Bengal belong to Caucasoid and six (one in WB and five in Manipur) belong to Mongoloid stock. Both STR and the expressed loci show wide diversity among the eight populations. For example, Manipur Muslims show differences in allele frequency when compared to four other regional populations. Similarly, Garo, one of the Mongoloid populations of West Bengal, differ in allele frequency from their counterparts in the Manipur region. Departure from Hardy-Weinberg expectations was observed at certain loci in a few populations (e.g., D21S1137 in Kayastha and Brahmin, HUM F13B in Meitei). Heterozygosity values were higher for Caucasoid than Mongoloid groups. The overall gene differentiation (GST) for STR loci is higher (5.3%) than for those at the expressed region (4.6%). The clustering pattern of the eight populations differs with respect to different classes of genetic markers used. The dendrograms based on six coding loci (HLDQA1, LDLR, GYPA, HBGG, D7S8, GC) differs from those based on STR and VNTR markers. Caucasoid and Mongoloid groups form different clusters and Manipur Muslims are distinct from others. The clustering pattern corresponded with the spatial and ethnic affiliations of the populations. Using different classes of DNA loci at the coding and noncoding region will help to better understand the influence of population structure variables on the genetic structure of populations.

摘要

在印度西孟加拉邦和曼尼普尔邦地区的八个种群组中,研究了属于三个不同类别的22个多态性DNA位点的遗传变异的性质和程度,特别是12个STR位点(D3S1358、vWA、FGA、D5S818、D13S317、D7S820、D8S1179、D21S11、D18S51、HPRTB、F13B、LPL)、四个VNTR位点(D1S7、D4S139、D5S110、D17S79)和六个编码位点(HLDQA1、LDLR、GYPA、HBGG、D7S8、GC)。其中,来自西孟加拉邦的两个种群组属于高加索人种,六个(西孟加拉邦一个,曼尼普尔邦五个)属于蒙古人种。STR位点和表达位点在这八个种群中均表现出广泛的多样性。例如,与其他四个地区种群相比,曼尼普尔穆斯林的等位基因频率存在差异。同样,西孟加拉邦的蒙古人种群体之一加罗人,其等位基因频率与曼尼普尔地区的对应群体不同。在少数种群的某些位点观察到偏离哈迪-温伯格预期的情况(例如,卡亚斯塔人和婆罗门中的D21S1137,梅泰人中的HUM F13B)。高加索人种群体的杂合度值高于蒙古人种群体。STR位点的总体基因分化(GST)(5.3%)高于表达区域位点的总体基因分化(4.6%)。八个种群的聚类模式因所使用的不同类别的遗传标记而异。基于六个编码位点(HLDQA1、LDLR、GYPA、HBGG、D7S8、GC)的树状图与基于STR和VNTR标记的树状图不同。高加索人种群体和蒙古人种群体形成不同的聚类,曼尼普尔穆斯林与其他群体不同。聚类模式与种群的空间和种族归属相对应。在编码区和非编码区使用不同类别的DNA位点将有助于更好地理解种群结构变量对种群遗传结构的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验