Hartwig-Scherer S, Martin R D
Anthropologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Zürich, Switzerland.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1992 May;88(1):37-57. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330880105.
To avoid misinterpretation of allometric exponents determined from interspecific allometric comparisons, specific conditions must be met with respect to the common reference variable. Body weight is considered to be the best general indication of overall size and is hence widely acknowledged to be the most suitable reference variable. However, because of the paucity of recorded body weights for museum specimens, various comparative studies have used other size indicators as intervening variables, although the allometric relationships to body size/weight were often unknown and possibly differed between species. Because of differences in the scaling properties of alternative intervening variables across the species investigated, conflicting conclusions may be drawn if different variables are chosen as substitutes for overall size. This is illustrated with two examples. In this study, series of skeletons with associated body weights of Gorilla, Pan, Pongo, and Homo were investigated. Both ontogenetic and static adult allometric relationships between several widely used reference variables and body weight were determined. Neither these variables nor additional estimators investigated in this study displayed allometric exponents and coefficients similar enough across species to justify direct interspecific comparison. To generate an alternative size estimator for both ontogenetic and static interspecific investigations, equations for combined sexes were derived to predict body weight from various long bone dimensions for individual hominoid species. From a total of 25 predictors, 12 prediction equations per species (six for nonadults and six for adults) were selected according to their relative suitability for reliable prediction of body weight. It is shown that the derived reference variable "predicted body weight" avoids problems of intervening variables, is valid for any interspecific ontogenetic and static allometric comparison, and displays less fluctuation in comparison to actual body weight.
为避免因种间异速生长比较确定的异速生长指数被误解,必须满足关于共同参考变量的特定条件。体重被认为是整体大小的最佳一般指标,因此被广泛认可为最适合的参考变量。然而,由于博物馆标本记录的体重数据匮乏,各种比较研究使用了其他大小指标作为中间变量,尽管与体型/体重的异速生长关系往往未知,且可能因物种而异。由于所研究物种间替代中间变量的缩放特性存在差异,如果选择不同变量替代整体大小,可能会得出相互矛盾的结论。本文通过两个例子对此进行说明。在本研究中,对大猩猩、黑猩猩、猩猩和人类的一系列带有相关体重的骨骼进行了调查。确定了几个广泛使用的参考变量与体重之间的个体发育和静态成年异速生长关系。本研究中调查的这些变量以及其他估计量在物种间均未显示出足够相似的异速生长指数和系数,无法证明直接进行种间比较的合理性。为生成用于个体发育和静态种间研究的替代大小估计量,推导了两性合并的方程,以便根据各个类人猿物种的各种长骨尺寸预测体重。从总共25个预测变量中,根据它们对可靠预测体重的相对适用性,为每个物种选择了12个预测方程(6个用于非成年个体,6个用于成年个体)。结果表明,推导得出的参考变量“预测体重”避免了中间变量的问题,对任何种间个体发育和静态异速生长比较均有效,并且与实际体重相比波动较小。