Suppr超能文献

Timing of angiography and revascularization in acute coronary syndromes: an analysis of the TACTICS-TIMI-18 trial.

作者信息

McCullough Peter A, Gibson C Michael, Dibattiste Peter M, Demopoulos Laura A, Murphy Sabina A, Weintraub William S, Neumann Franz-Josef, Khanal Sanjay, Cannon Christopher P

机构信息

Divisions of Cardiology, Nutrition, and Preventive Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2004 Apr;17(2):81-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2004.021001.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In aggregate, published randomized trials of invasive versus conservative treatment in patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction support an invasive strategy, but the optimal timing of an invasive approach is not fully established. The Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS) Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)-18 Trial treated all patients with upstream intravenous tirofiban and heparin for 48 hours or until revascularization, and randomized subjects to an invasive or conservative approach. We hypothesized that patients who underwent earlier intervention in the invasive arm would have improved outcomes.

METHODS

We evaluated 1,078 participants from the invasive arm, who underwent angiography stratified by time after randomization to the procedure. The composite outcome was death, myocardial infarction (MI), or rehospitalization.

RESULTS

At 6 months, the rates of the composite outcome were 15.4 and 19.5% for those undergoing catheterization before and after 48 hours after randomization, respectively, P = 0.34. Rates of individual endpoints were similar except MI, which occurred in 2.9 versus 6.5%, in those who underwent angiography before or after 48 hours, respectively, P = 0.08.

CONCLUSION

We could not identify a benefit to early intervention on hard endpoints. There were level time-dependent risks of cardiac events during a period of 48 hours prior to cardiac catheterization possibly due to the effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition. Considering that the groups were not randomized based on time and the potential selection bias in this analysis, these data should be considered only hypothesis generating. A prospective, randomized trial is warranted to explore whether immediate invasive strategy is better than an early invasive strategy in the setting of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验