Suppr超能文献

替罗非班治疗后不稳定型心绞痛和非Q波心肌梗死的侵入性与保守策略:国际TACTICS-TIMI 18试验的原理和研究设计。用阿昔单抗治疗心绞痛并确定侵入性或保守策略的治疗成本。心肌梗死溶栓治疗。

Invasive versus conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction following treatment with tirofiban: rationale and study design of the international TACTICS-TIMI 18 Trial. Treat Angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction.

作者信息

Cannon C P, Weintraub W S, Demopoulos L A, Robertson D H, Gormley G J, Braunwald E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1998 Sep 15;82(6):731-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00540-2.

Abstract

In the management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction (AMI), there is considerable debate regarding the use of invasive strategy versus conservative strategy. The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) III B trial found similar clinical outcomes for the 2 strategies, but the Veterans Administration Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in-Hospital trial found a higher mortality with the invasive strategy. Both these trials were conducted before platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and coronary stenting, both of which improve clinical outcome. Thus, there is a need to reexamine the question of which management strategy is optimal in the current era of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and new coronary interventions. The Treat Angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS-TIMI 18) trial is an international, multicenter, randomized trial that is evaluating the clinical efficacy of early invasive and early conservative treatment strategies in patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave AMI treated with tirofiban, heparin, and aspirin. Patients are randomized to an invasive strategy, involving cardiac catheterization within 4 to 48 hours and revascularization with angioplasty or bypass surgery if feasible, versus a conservative strategy, where patients are referred for catheterization only for recurrent pain at rest or provokable ischemia. The primary end point is death, MI, or rehospitalization for acute coronary syndromes through a 6-month follow-up. The trial is also testing the "troponin hypothesis," that baseline troponins T and I will be useful in selecting an optimal management strategy.

摘要

在不稳定型心绞痛和非Q波急性心肌梗死(AMI)的治疗中,关于采用侵入性策略还是保守策略存在相当大的争议。心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)III B试验发现这两种策略的临床结果相似,但退伍军人管理局非Q波梗死住院治疗策略试验发现侵入性策略的死亡率更高。这两项试验都是在血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制和冠状动脉支架置入术之前进行的,而这两项技术都能改善临床结果。因此,有必要重新审视在当前血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制和新型冠状动脉介入治疗时代哪种治疗策略最为理想的问题。用阿昔单抗治疗心绞痛并确定侵入性或保守性策略的治疗成本(TACTICS-TIMI 18)试验是一项国际多中心随机试验,正在评估替罗非班、肝素和阿司匹林治疗的不稳定型心绞痛或非Q波AMI患者早期侵入性和早期保守治疗策略的临床疗效。患者被随机分为侵入性策略组,即在4至48小时内进行心导管检查,可行时通过血管成形术或搭桥手术进行血运重建;以及保守策略组,即仅在患者因静息性复发性疼痛或可诱发性缺血而接受导管检查时才进行。主要终点是通过6个月的随访得出的死亡、心肌梗死或因急性冠状动脉综合征再次住院的情况。该试验还在检验“肌钙蛋白假说”,即基线肌钙蛋白T和I将有助于选择最佳治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验