Garuti Giancarlo, Cellani Fulvia, Colonnelli Monica, Garzia Delia, Gonfiantini Cristina, Luerti Massimo
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lodi Hospital, Lodi, Italy.
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 Feb;11(1):62-7. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60013-8.
To determine the validity of tissue sampling accomplished by hysteroscopically targeted or blind biopsies in the assessment of endometrial morbidity associated with tamoxifen treatment.
Retrospective, unrandomized study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
Public hospital.
One hundred seventy-six menopausal women who had an endometrial stripe of more than 4 mm on transvaginal ultrasonography.
Review of histopathologic reports of patients undergoing hysteroscopy followed by targeted (94 samplings) or blind (82 samplings) endometrial biopsies.
Histopathology was considered the reference test to assess endometrial morbidity, and correlates with hysteroscopic findings were made to evaluate the validity of the two sampling procedures. Overall, in 23 women (13.0%) tissue samples were insufficient for pathologic evaluation. Functional or atrophic endometrium and cystic atrophy were found in 51 (28.8%) and 37 patients (21.0%), respectively. Polyps, hyperplasias, and carcinomas were found in 38 (21.5%), 19 (10.7%), and 6 (3.3%), respectively. Blind biopsies failed to detect 5 of 5 polyps and 33 of 37 cystic atrophies, and in 34.1% of cases provided insufficient tissue for diagnosis; however, no hyperplasias or carcinomas were undetected. All specimens collected under vision were pathologically evaluable; 34 of 38 hysteroscopic reports of cystic atrophy were confirmed, and neither endometrial polyps nor hyperplasias and carcinomas were undetected. In distinguishing between normal and abnormal endometrium, hysteroscopy showed sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100% regardless of sampling modality. We found better specificity (80.0% vs 68.9%) and positive predictive value (68.9% vs 43.7%) for hysteroscopic diagnosis when tissue was collected under vision compared with blind sampling.
In women taking tamoxifen, endometrial evaluation performed by blind sampling is safe in excluding hyperplasias or carcinomas. For complete understanding of tamoxifen-associated morbidity, hysteroscopy with sampling under vision has better diagnostic compliance.
确定通过宫腔镜靶向活检或盲目活检获取的组织样本在评估他莫昔芬治疗相关子宫内膜病变中的有效性。
回顾性、非随机研究(加拿大工作组分类II - 2)。
公立医院。
176名绝经后妇女,经阴道超声检查显示子宫内膜厚度超过4mm。
回顾接受宫腔镜检查并随后进行靶向(94次采样)或盲目(82次采样)子宫内膜活检患者的组织病理学报告。
组织病理学被视为评估子宫内膜病变的参考标准,并与宫腔镜检查结果相关联,以评估两种采样方法的有效性。总体而言,23名女性(13.0%)的组织样本不足以进行病理评估。分别在51名(28.8%)和37名患者(21.0%)中发现功能性或萎缩性子宫内膜及囊性萎缩。息肉、增生和癌分别在38名(21.5%)、19名(10.7%)和6名患者(3.3%)中发现。盲目活检未能检测出5个息肉中的5个以及37个囊性萎缩中的33个,并且在34.1%的病例中提供的组织不足以诊断;然而,未漏诊增生或癌。所有在直视下采集的标本均可进行病理评估;38份宫腔镜检查报告中有34份囊性萎缩得到证实,且未漏诊子宫内膜息肉、增生或癌。在区分正常与异常子宫内膜方面,无论采样方式如何,宫腔镜检查的敏感性和阴性预测值均为100%。与盲目采样相比,我们发现直视下采集组织时,宫腔镜诊断具有更高的特异性(80.0%对68.9%)和阳性预测值(68.9%对43.7%)。
对于服用他莫昔芬的女性,盲目采样进行子宫内膜评估在排除增生或癌方面是安全的。为全面了解他莫昔芬相关病变,直视下采样的宫腔镜检查具有更好的诊断符合率。