Akinboboye Olakunle O, Chou Ru-Ling, Bergmann Steven R
Non-Invasive Labortatory, Saint Francis Hospital, 100 Port Washington Boulevard, Roslyn, NY 11576, USA.
Am J Hypertens. 2004 May;17(5 Pt 1):433-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.02.006.
It is not clearly understood why concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (increased left ventricular mass and relative wall thickness) is associated with higher cardiovascular risk than eccentric hypertrophy (increased left ventricular mass but normal relative wall thickness). Possible reasons include lower myocardial efficiency or perfusion reserve in concentric than in eccentric hypertrophy. We compared myocardial perfusion reserve and efficiency in normotensive controls and in hypertensive patients with concentric and with eccentric hypertrophy.
Study subjects comprised 16 patients with hypertension-induced left ventricular hypertrophy and 10 normotensive controls. We measured myocardial perfusion reserve and oxygen consumption by positron emission tomography. We calculated myocardial efficiency by dividing left ventricular minute work by myocardial oxygen consumption.
There was no significant difference in myocardial perfusion reserve between patients with concentric (n = 9) as compared to eccentric (n = 7) hypertrophy. However, myocardial perfusion reserve in both patient groups were lower than in controls. Although myocardial efficiency in patients with eccentric hypertrophy and in controls were not different, both values were higher than measurements in patients with concentric hypertrophy (18% +/- 6% v 16% +/- 3% v 13% +/- 4%, eccentric hypertrophy versus controls versus concentric hypertrophy, respectively, P =.04 for both eccentric versus concentric hypertrophy and for controls versus concentric hypertrophy).
Myocardial efficiency but not perfusion reserve is lower in hearts with concentric compared with eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy. This might be an explanation for the higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with concentric left ventricular hypertrophy.
目前尚不清楚为何同心性左心室肥厚(左心室质量增加且相对壁厚增加)比离心性肥厚(左心室质量增加但相对壁厚正常)具有更高的心血管风险。可能的原因包括同心性肥厚时心肌效率或灌注储备低于离心性肥厚。我们比较了正常血压对照组以及患有同心性和离心性肥厚的高血压患者的心肌灌注储备和效率。
研究对象包括16例高血压所致左心室肥厚患者和10例正常血压对照者。我们通过正电子发射断层扫描测量心肌灌注储备和氧消耗。我们通过将左心室每分钟做功除以心肌氧消耗来计算心肌效率。
同心性肥厚患者(n = 9)与离心性肥厚患者(n = 7)的心肌灌注储备无显著差异。然而,两组患者的心肌灌注储备均低于对照组。虽然离心性肥厚患者与对照组的心肌效率无差异,但这两个值均高于同心性肥厚患者的测量值(分别为18%±6%、16%±3%、13%±4%,分别为离心性肥厚与对照组、对照组与同心性肥厚相比,离心性肥厚与同心性肥厚以及对照组与同心性肥厚相比P均 = 0.04)。
与离心性左心室肥厚相比,同心性左心室肥厚心脏的心肌效率较低而非灌注储备较低。这可能是同心性左心室肥厚相关心血管发病率和死亡率较高的一个解释。