Zander A R, Kröger N, Schmoor C, Krüger W, Möbus V, Frickhofen N, Metzner B, Schultze W, Berdel W E, Koenigsmann M, Thiel E, Wandt H, Possinger K, Trümper L, Kreienberg R, Carstensen M, Schmidt E H, Jänicke F, Schumacher M, Jonat W
Transplant Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 15;22(12):2273-83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.026. Epub 2004 Apr 26.
Investigation of high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support compared with standard-dose chemotherapy (SD-CT) as adjuvant treatment in patients with primary breast cancer and 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes.
Between November 1993 and September 2000, 307 patients were randomized to receive (following four cycles of epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), intravenously every 21 days) either HD-CT of cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m(2), thiotepa 150 mg/m(2), and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2), intravenously for 4 consecutive days followed by stem-cell support; or SD-CT in three cycles of cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2), methotrexate 40 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8, every 28 days. The primary end point was event-free survival.
After a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 144 events with respect to event-free survival have been observed (HD-CT: 63 events; SD-CT: 81 events). The first event of failure (HD-CT v SD-CT) was an isolated locoregional recurrence (nine v 11), a distant failure (52 v 68), and death without recurrence (two v two). The estimated relative risk of HD-CT versus SD-CT was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.54 to 1.06; P =.095). Overall survival showed no difference (HD-CT: 40 deaths; SD-CT: 49 deaths).
There was a trend in favor of HD-CT with respect to event-free survival, but without statistical significance. Further follow-up and a meta-analysis of all randomized studies will reveal the effect of HD-CT as compared with SD-CT as adjuvant treatment in high-risk primary breast cancer.
研究大剂量化疗(HD-CT)联合自体造血干细胞支持与标准剂量化疗(SD-CT)相比,作为原发性乳腺癌且腋窝淋巴结转移10个及以上患者辅助治疗的效果。
1993年11月至2000年9月期间,307例患者被随机分组,在接受4个周期表柔比星90mg/m²和环磷酰胺600mg/m²静脉注射(每21天一次)后,一组接受环磷酰胺1500mg/m²、噻替派150mg/m²和米托蒽醌10mg/m²连续4天静脉注射的大剂量化疗并继以干细胞支持治疗;另一组接受环磷酰胺500mg/m²、甲氨蝶呤40mg/m²和氟尿嘧啶600mg/m²于第1天和第8天静脉注射,每28天为一个周期的3个周期标准剂量化疗。主要终点为无事件生存期。
中位随访3.8年后,观察到144例无事件生存期相关事件(大剂量化疗组:63例;标准剂量化疗组:81例)。首次失败事件(大剂量化疗组对标准剂量化疗组)包括孤立的局部区域复发(9例对11例)、远处转移(52例对68例)以及无复发死亡(2例对2例)。大剂量化疗组与标准剂量化疗组相比的估计相对风险为0.75(95%可信区间,0.54至1.06;P = 0.095)。总生存期无差异(大剂量化疗组:40例死亡;标准剂量化疗组:49例死亡)。
大剂量化疗在无事件生存期方面有优势趋势,但无统计学意义。进一步随访以及对所有随机研究的荟萃分析将揭示大剂量化疗与标准剂量化疗相比作为高危原发性乳腺癌辅助治疗的效果。