Hanrahan Emer O, Broglio Kristine, Frye Deborah, Buzdar Aman U, Theriault Richard L, Valero Vicente, Booser Daniel J, Singletary Sonja E, Strom Eric A, Gajewski James L, Champlin Richard E, Hortobagyi Gabriel N
Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Cancer. 2006 Jun 1;106(11):2327-36. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21906.
The authors previously reported results from a randomized trial of standard-dose chemotherapy with combined 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2 per cycle), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 per cycle), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2 per cycle) (FAC) versus FAC followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell support (ASCS) for patients with high-risk primary breast carcinoma. After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, no significant differences were observed in recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) between the 2 arms. This report updates the survival analyses.
Patients with >or=10 positive axillary lymph nodes after primary surgery or >or=4 positive lymph nodes at surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible. All patients were to receive 8 cycles of FAC. Patients were assigned randomly to receive either no further chemotherapy or 2 cycles of combined high-dose cyclophosphamide (5250 mg/m2 per cycle), etoposide (1200 mg/m2 per cycle), and cisplatin (165 mg/m2 per cycle) with ASCS. Primary endpoints were RFS and OS. RFS and OS were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank statistic was used to compare treatment arms.
Between 1990 and 1997, 78 patients were registered, and 39 patients were assigned randomly to each arm. The median follow-up for all patients who were alive at last follow-up was 142.5 months (range, 45-169 months). An intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference between the 2 arms in terms of RFS (at 10 years: 40% with FAC vs. 26% with FAC plus HDCT; P=.11) or OS (at 10 years: 47% with FAC vs. 42% with FAC plus HDCT; P=.13).
With a median follow-up of nearly 12 years for patients who remained alive, this trial continued to demonstrate no RFS or OS advantage for patients with high-risk primary breast carcinoma treated with HDCT after standard-dose FAC chemotherapy.
作者之前报道了一项随机试验的结果,该试验针对高危原发性乳腺癌患者,比较了标准剂量化疗(每周期联合使用5-氟尿嘧啶1000mg/m²、多柔比星50mg/m²和环磷酰胺500mg/m²,即FAC方案)与FAC方案后序贯大剂量化疗(HDCT)及自体干细胞支持(ASCS)的疗效。中位随访6.5年后,两组在无复发生存期(RFS)或总生存期(OS)方面未观察到显著差异。本报告更新了生存分析结果。
符合条件的患者为初次手术后腋窝淋巴结阳性≥10枚或新辅助化疗后手术时淋巴结阳性≥4枚。所有患者均接受8周期的FAC方案化疗。患者被随机分配接受后续不再化疗或接受2周期联合大剂量环磷酰胺(每周期5250mg/m²)、依托泊苷(每周期1200mg/m²)和顺铂(每周期165mg/m²)并接受ASCS。主要终点为RFS和OS。RFS和OS采用Kaplan-Meier法计算。采用对数秩检验比较各治疗组。
1990年至1997年期间,共登记78例患者,每组随机分配39例患者。对最后一次随访时仍存活的所有患者的中位随访时间为142.5个月(范围45 - 169个月)。意向性分析显示,两组在RFS(10年时:FAC方案组为40%,FAC方案加HDCT组为26%;P = 0.11)或OS(10年时:FAC方案组为47%,FAC方案加HDCT组为42%;P = 0.13)方面无显著差异。
对于存活患者的中位随访近12年,本试验继续表明,高危原发性乳腺癌患者在接受标准剂量FAC化疗后再接受HDCT治疗,在RFS或OS方面并无优势。