Suppr超能文献

卡维地洛与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂早期联合治疗轻度心力衰竭和左心室收缩功能障碍的益处。卡维地洛与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂重塑轻度心力衰竭评估试验(CARMEN)。

The benefits of early combination treatment of carvedilol and an ACE-inhibitor in mild heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The carvedilol and ACE-inhibitor remodelling mild heart failure evaluation trial (CARMEN).

作者信息

Remme Willem J, Riegger Guenter, Hildebrandt Per, Komajda Michel, Jaarsma Wybren, Bobbio Marco, Soler-Soler Jordi, Scherhag Armin, Lutiger Beatrix, Rydén Lars

机构信息

Sticares Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Rhoon, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2004 Jan;18(1):57-66. doi: 10.1023/B:CARD.0000025756.32499.6f.

Abstract

AIMS

Heart failure (HF) treatment guidelines of the ESC recommend ACE-inhibitors (ACE-I) as first-line treatment and beta-blockers added if patients remain symptomatic. CARMEN explored the need for combined treatment for remodelling and order of introduction by comparing the ACE-I enalapril against carvedilol and their combination.

METHODS

In a parallel-group, 3-arm study of 18 months duration, 572 mild heart failure patients were randomly assigned to carvedilol (N = 191), enalapril (N = 190) or their combination (N = 191). In the latter, carvedilol was up-titrated before enalapril. Left ventricular (LV) remodelling was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (biplane, modified Simpson) at baseline and after 6, 12 and 18 months of maintenance therapy. Primary comparisons considered the change in LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) from baseline to month 18 between the combination and enalapril, and between carvedilol and enalapril.

RESULTS

In the first primary comparison, LVESVI was reduced by 5.4 ml/m2 (p = 0.0015) in favour of combination therapy compared to enalapril. The second primary comparison tended to favour carvedilol to enalapril (NS). In the within treatment arm analyses, carvedilol significantly reduced LVESVI by 2.8 ml/m2 (p = 0.018) compared to baseline, whereas enalapril did not. LVESVI decreased by 6.3 ml/m2 (p = 0.0001) with combination therapy. All three arms showed similar safety profiles and withdrawal rates.

CONCLUSION

CARMEN is the first study to demonstrate that early combination of ACE-I and carvedilol reverses LV remodelling in patients with mild to moderate HF and LV systolic dysfunction. The results of the CARMEN study support a therapeutic strategy in which the institution of beta-blockade should not be delayed.

摘要

目的

欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)的心力衰竭(HF)治疗指南推荐将血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE-I)作为一线治疗药物,若患者仍有症状则加用β受体阻滞剂。卡门(CARMEN)研究通过比较ACE-I依那普利与卡维地洛及其联合用药,探讨了联合治疗对重塑的必要性及用药顺序。

方法

在一项为期18个月的平行组、三臂研究中,572例轻度心力衰竭患者被随机分配至卡维地洛组(N = 191)、依那普利组(N = 190)或二者联合组(N = 191)。在联合组中,卡维地洛在依那普利之前进行剂量滴定。在基线以及维持治疗6、12和18个月后,通过经胸超声心动图(双平面、改良辛普森法)评估左心室(LV)重塑情况。主要比较联合组与依那普利组、卡维地洛组与依那普利组从基线到第18个月左心室收缩末期容积指数(LVESVI)的变化。

结果

在首次主要比较中,与依那普利相比,联合治疗使LVESVI降低了5.4 ml/m²(p = 0.0015)。第二次主要比较倾向于卡维地洛优于依那普利(无统计学意义)。在各治疗组内分析中,与基线相比,卡维地洛使LVESVI显著降低了2.8 ml/m²(p = 0.018),而依那普利未降低。联合治疗使LVESVI降低了6.3 ml/m²(p = 0.0001)。所有三组的安全性和撤药率相似。

结论

卡门研究是首个表明ACE-I与卡维地洛早期联合用药可逆转轻至中度HF和LV收缩功能障碍患者LV重塑的研究。卡门研究结果支持不应延迟使用β受体阻滞剂的治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验