• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对从美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民社区收集和使用人类生物材料的研究指南的分析。

An analysis of research guidelines on the collection and use of human biological materials from American Indian and Alaskan Native communities.

作者信息

Sharp Richard R, Foster Morris W

机构信息

Program in Environmental Health Policy and Ethics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, USA.

出版信息

Jurimetrics. 2002 Winter;42(2):165-86.

PMID:15119331
Abstract

American Indian and Alaskan Native communities have expressed concern about the use of human biological materials in research. These concerns have prompted research sponsors and professional organizations to develop guidelines for investigators working with these communities. This paper reviews research guidelines and presents recommendations that reflect "best practices" for working with North American indigenous communities in the collection, storage, and distribution of human biological materials for research. These recommendations strike a reasonable balance between three imperatives in research: (1) minimizing harm, (2) treating sample contributors with respect, and (3) promoting intellectual freedom to pursue a range of research questions. The recommendations can be used in designing appropriate methods of collecting and using human biological materials from members of American Indian and Alaskan Native communities and will likely be applicable to other historically disadvantaged communities as well.

摘要

美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民社区对研究中使用人类生物材料表示担忧。这些担忧促使研究资助者和专业组织为与这些社区合作的研究人员制定指导方针。本文回顾了研究指导方针,并提出了一些建议,这些建议反映了在为研究收集、储存和分发人类生物材料时与北美原住民社区合作的“最佳实践”。这些建议在研究的三个要素之间达成了合理平衡:(1)将危害降至最低;(2)尊重样本提供者;(3)促进追求一系列研究问题的学术自由。这些建议可用于设计从美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民社区成员中收集和使用人类生物材料的适当方法,并且可能也适用于其他历史上处于弱势的社区。

相似文献

1
An analysis of research guidelines on the collection and use of human biological materials from American Indian and Alaskan Native communities.对从美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民社区收集和使用人类生物材料的研究指南的分析。
Jurimetrics. 2002 Winter;42(2):165-86.
2
Native American recommendations for genetic research to be culturally respectful.美国原住民对基因研究的建议,以做到文化上的尊重。
Jurimetrics. 2002 Winter;42(2):149-57.
3
A critical appraisal of protections for aboriginal communities in biomedical research.
Jurimetrics. 2002 Winter;42(2):187-98.
4
Cultural issues in genetic research with American Indian and Alaskan Native people.针对美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的基因研究中的文化问题。
IRB. 2003 Jul-Aug;25(4):12-5.
5
Perspectives on research in American Indian communities.对美国印第安社区研究的见解
Jurimetrics. 2002 Winter;42(2):145-8.
6
Building a new culture of ethics in research involving humans in Brazil.在巴西建立涉及人类的研究中的新道德文化。
Not Polit. 2002;18(67):101-12.
7
Clarity and appeal of a multimedia informed consent tool for biobanking.生物样本库多媒体知情同意工具的清晰度和吸引力。
IRB. 2012 Jan-Feb;34(1):9-19.
8
Applied research ethics with Aboriginal people: a Canadian dilemma.针对原住民的应用研究伦理:加拿大面临的困境。
NCEHR Commun. 2004 Spring;12(2):6-11.
9
DNA gatherers hit a snag: the tribes don't trust them.DNA采集者遇到了麻烦:部落不信任他们。
N Y Times Web. 2006 Dec 10:A1, A38.
10
Proposed model ethical protocol for collecting DNA samples.收集DNA样本的拟议模型伦理协议。
Houst Law Rev. 1997;33(5):1431-74.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of guidelines for the use of race, ethnicity, and ancestry reveals widespread consensus but also points of ongoing disagreement.种族、民族和血统使用指南的范围综述揭示了广泛的共识,但也指出了持续存在的分歧点。
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Dec 1;109(12):2110-2125. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
2
The commercialization of biospecimens from Indigenous Peoples: A scoping review of benefit-sharing.原住民生物样本的商业化:利益共享的范围综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 4;9:978826. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.978826. eCollection 2022.
3
Arsenic Concentrations in Ground and Surface Waters across Arizona Including Native Lands.
亚利桑那州包括原住民土地在内的地下水和地表水的砷浓度。
J Contemp Water Res Educ. 2020 Apr;169(1):44-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1936-704x.2020.03331.x. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
4
Data Management in Health-Related Research Involving Indigenous Communities in the United States and Canada: A Scoping Review.美国和加拿大涉及原住民社区的健康相关研究中的数据管理:一项范围综述
Front Genet. 2019 Oct 10;10:942. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00942. eCollection 2019.
5
Scientists' perspectives on consent in the context of biobanking research.科学家对生物样本库研究背景下知情同意的看法。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 May;23(5):569-74. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.143. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
6
Incorporating exclusion clauses into informed consent for biobanking.将排除条款纳入生物样本库知情同意书。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2013 Apr;22(2):203-12. doi: 10.1017/S0963180112000576.
7
Consent for long-term storage of blood samples by Indigenous Australian research participants: the DRUID Study experience.澳大利亚原住民研究参与者对长期储存血样的同意:DRUID研究经验。
Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2007 Sep 7;4:7. doi: 10.1186/1742-5573-4-7.
8
Integrating ethics and science in the International HapMap Project.在国际人类基因组单体型图计划中融合伦理与科学。
Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Jun;5(6):467-75. doi: 10.1038/nrg1351.