Kalinowski Joseph, Saltuklaroglu Tim
School of Allied Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Apr;20(4):509-15. doi: 10.1185/030079904125003287.
Physicians are often the first point of contact when children's speech begins to be disrupted by stuttering behaviors such as sound repetitions and prolongations. For this reason, we feel it is important that they are accurately informed with regards to the nature of stuttering and the available treatment options before making referrals to speech-language pathologists. Stuttering is by definition, an involuntary disorder and remains that way throughout life. Its cause is still unknown and the only true form of remission appears to be the natural, spontaneous recovery that occurs in up to 80% of those children afflicted. No therapeutic course has seemed to change this figure and the prevalence of stuttering in the general population has remained stable, suggesting that speech therapy has never 'cured' stuttering. Therefore, we suggest that therapeutic intervention for stuttering should be best directed towards 'efficient' and 'effective' symptom reduction. Until recently, intervention options for children and adults who stutter have generally been limited consist of countless hours of speech retraining (teaching people 'how to talk again'), while attempting to bring the disorder under voluntary control. The common end-results of these procedures include unnatural speech patterns that are difficult to maintain in all situations and highly prone to relapse, thus, reinforcing the notion that stuttering is highly resistant to treatment. However, miniaturized digital technology now allows those who stutter to take advantage of auditory effects that 'inhibit' stuttering. 'Choral speech' or speaking in unison has long been known to make those who stutter immediately fluent without compromising speech naturalness. All in-the-ear devices can emulate choral speech effects by altering auditory feedback. Therapeutic protocols using these devices can be quickly and efficiently implemented. Furthermore, they are showing high levels of long-term effectiveness with regards to reducing stuttering frequency and maintaining speech naturalness.
当儿童的言语开始因诸如声音重复和延长等口吃行为而受到干扰时,医生通常是首要接触点。因此,我们认为在将患者转介给言语治疗师之前,准确告知他们口吃的本质和可用的治疗选择非常重要。根据定义,口吃是一种不由自主的疾病,并且终生如此。其病因仍然不明,唯一真正的缓解形式似乎是自然自发恢复,这种情况在多达80%的患病儿童中会出现。没有任何治疗方法似乎改变了这一比例,而且口吃在普通人群中的患病率一直保持稳定,这表明言语治疗从未“治愈”过口吃。因此,我们建议口吃的治疗干预最好旨在“有效”和“高效”地减轻症状。直到最近,对口吃儿童和成人的干预选择通常有限,包括无数小时的言语再训练(教人们“如何再次说话”),同时试图使这种疾病处于自主控制之下。这些程序的常见最终结果包括不自然的言语模式,这些模式在所有情况下都难以维持,而且极易复发,因此,强化了口吃对治疗具有高度抗性的观念。然而,小型数字技术现在使口吃者能够利用“抑制”口吃的听觉效果。“合唱言语”或齐声说话早就被认为能使口吃者立即流利起来,而不会影响言语的自然度。所有入耳式设备都可以通过改变听觉反馈来模拟合唱言语效果。使用这些设备的治疗方案可以快速有效地实施。此外,它们在降低口吃频率和保持言语自然度方面显示出很高的长期效果。