Smith Tanya M, Martin Lawrence B, Reid Donald J, de Bonis Louis, Koufos George D
Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364, USA.
J Hum Evol. 2004 May;46(5):551-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.01.006.
This study examined enamel thickness and dental development in Graecopithecus freybergi (=Ouranopithecus macedoniensis), a late Miocene hominoid from Greece. Comparative emphasis was placed on Proconsul, Afropithecus, Dryopithecus, Lufengpithecus, and Gigantopithecus, fossil apes that vary in enamel thickness and patterns of development. In addition, comparisons were made with Paranthropus to investigate reported similarities in enamel thickness. Several sections of a right lower third molar were generated, from which enamel thickness and aspects of the enamel and dentine microstructure were determined. Data from parallel sections shed light on the effects of section obliquity, which may influence determination of both enamel thickness and crown formation time. Graecopithecus has relatively thick enamel, greater than any fossil ape but less than Paranthropus, with which it does show similarity in prism path and Hunter-Schreger band morphology. Aspects of enamel microstructure, including the periodicity and daily secretion rate, are similar to most extant and fossil apes, especially Afropithecus. Total crown formation time was estimated to be 3.5 years, which is greater than published values for modern Homo, similar to Pan, and less than Gigantopithecus. Data on dentine secretion and extension rates suggest that coronal dentine formation was relatively slow, but comparative data are very limited. Graecopithecus shares a crown formation pattern with several thick-enamelled hominoids, in which cuspal enamel makes up a very large portion of crown area, is formed by a large cell cohort, and is formed in less than half of the total time of formation. In Paranthropus, this pattern appears to be even more extreme, which may result in thicker enamel formed in an even shorter time. Developmental similarities between Paranthropus and Graecopithecus are interpreted to be parallelisms due to similarities in the mechanical demands of their diets.
本研究调查了希腊中新世晚期类人猿弗雷贝格希腊古猿(=马其顿山猿)的牙釉质厚度和牙齿发育情况。研究重点比较了森林古猿、非洲古猿、Dryopithecus、禄丰古猿和巨猿等化石猿类,这些化石猿类的牙釉质厚度和发育模式各不相同。此外,还与傍人进行了比较,以研究牙釉质厚度方面已报道的相似性。制作了右下第三磨牙的几个切片,据此确定牙釉质厚度以及牙釉质和牙本质微观结构的相关方面。平行切片的数据揭示了切片倾斜度的影响,这可能会影响牙釉质厚度和牙冠形成时间的测定。希腊古猿的牙釉质相对较厚,比任何化石猿类都厚,但比傍人薄,在棱柱路径和亨特-施雷格带形态上与傍人确实存在相似性。牙釉质微观结构的各个方面,包括周期性和每日分泌率,与大多数现存和化石猿类相似,尤其是非洲古猿。估计牙冠总形成时间为3.5年,这比现代智人的已公布值要长,与黑猩猩相似,比巨猿短。牙本质分泌和延伸速率的数据表明,牙冠牙本质形成相对较慢,但比较数据非常有限。希腊古猿与几种牙釉质厚的类人猿具有相同的牙冠形成模式,其中尖部牙釉质占牙冠面积的很大一部分,由大量细胞群形成,且在总形成时间的不到一半时间内形成。在傍人中,这种模式似乎更为极端,这可能导致在更短的时间内形成更厚的牙釉质。傍人和希腊古猿之间的发育相似性被解释为由于它们饮食的机械需求相似而产生的平行现象。