Abou-Chebl Alex, Yadav Jay S, Reginelli Joel P, Bajzer Christopher, Bhatt Deepak, Krieger Derk W
Department of Neurology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 May 5;43(9):1596-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.039.
The study defined the incidence of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and the risk factors for their development following carotid artery stenting (CAS).
Hyperperfusion syndrome and ICH can complicate carotid revascularization, be it endarterectomy or CAS. Although extensive effort has been devoted to reducing the incidence of ischemic stroke complicating CAS, little is known about the incidence, etiology, and prevention strategies for hyperperfusion and ICH following CAS.
We retrospectively reviewed the prospective database of 450 consecutive patients who were treated with CAS in our department to identify patients who developed hyperperfusion syndrome and/or ICH.
The mean age of the patients was 72.7 +/- 10.9 years, and the mean diameter narrowing was 84 +/- 12.8%. Five (1.1% [95% confidence interval 0.4% to 2.6%]) patients developed hyperperfusion. Three (0.67%) of the five developed ICH. Two of these patients died (0.44%). Symptoms developed within a median of 10 h (range, 6 h to 4 days) following stenting. All five patients had correction of a severe internal carotid stenosis (mean 95.6 +/- 3.7%) with a concurrent contralateral stenosis >80% or contralateral occlusion and peri-procedural hypertension. These same risk factors are involved in cerebral hyperperfusion following carotid endarterectomy. The use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers did not appear to increase the risk ICH.
The hyperperfusion syndrome occurs infrequently following CAS, and ICH occurs in 0.67% of patients. Patients with severe bilateral carotid stenoses may be predisposed to ICH, particularly if there is concurrent arterial hypertension. Patients with these factors may require more intensive hemodynamic monitoring after CAS, including prolongation of hospitalization in some cases.
本研究确定了脑过度灌注综合征和颅内出血(ICH)的发生率及其在颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)后发生的危险因素。
过度灌注综合征和ICH可使颈动脉血运重建复杂化,无论是内膜切除术还是CAS。尽管已付出巨大努力降低CAS并发缺血性卒中的发生率,但对于CAS后过度灌注和ICH的发生率、病因及预防策略知之甚少。
我们回顾性分析了在我科连续接受CAS治疗的450例患者的前瞻性数据库,以确定发生过度灌注综合征和/或ICH的患者。
患者的平均年龄为72.7±10.9岁,平均直径狭窄率为84±12.8%。5例(1.1%[95%置信区间0.4%至2.6%])患者发生过度灌注。其中3例(0.67%)发生ICH。这些患者中有2例死亡(0.44%)。症状在支架置入术后中位时间10小时(范围6小时至4天)内出现。所有5例患者均纠正了严重的颈内动脉狭窄(平均95.6±3.7%),同时伴有对侧狭窄>80%或对侧闭塞以及围手术期高血压。这些相同的危险因素与颈动脉内膜切除术后的脑过度灌注有关。使用血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体阻滞剂似乎并未增加ICH的风险。
CAS后过度灌注综合征发生率较低,ICH发生率为0.67%。双侧严重颈动脉狭窄患者可能易发生ICH,尤其是在并发动脉高血压时。有这些因素的患者在CAS后可能需要更密切的血流动力学监测,包括在某些情况下延长住院时间。