Wiorowski Marc, Schultz Philippe, Perrot Jean-Baptiste, Gentine André, Debry Christian
Department of Otorhinolaryngolgy, Service d'ORL, Hôpital de Hautepierre, 1 av. Molière, CHU Hautepierre, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2004 Jun;31(2):131-3. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2003.11.003.
The authors present a retrospective study concerning cauterization by endoscopic approach of the sphenopalatine artery in the treatment of severe posterior epistaxis. The purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness of these therapeutics, their complications, to determine their indications and their contributions to the therapeutic arsenal of the treatment of severe epistaxis.
This study concerns 10 patients, which have been operated in the department of ORL head and neck surgery of Strasbourg and treated over a 23-month period (from January 2001 to November 2002), for clinically labelled posterior origin epistaxis. A preliminary treatment, by anterior and posterior tamponage, using a Brighton Epistaxis Balloon was carried out (n = 8); the use of an associated ligature of the ethmoidal arteries was sometimes necessary during operative time (n = 4).
Hemorrhagic control with absence of recurrence was the rule (n = 9). A complementary interventional radiology embolization due to failure was necessary in one case. The average duration of post-surgical hospitalization was of 2.1 days. No post-surgical complications were noted.
Cauterization by endonasal approach of the sphenopalatine artery in severe posterior epistaxis is a reliable intervention. Its role is clearly defined in our department, after failure of traditional treatments by packing methods.
作者开展了一项关于经内镜烧灼蝶腭动脉治疗严重后鼻孔出血的回顾性研究。目的是评估这些治疗方法的有效性、并发症,确定其适应证以及它们对严重鼻出血治疗手段的贡献。
本研究涉及10例患者,他们在斯特拉斯堡耳鼻咽喉头颈外科接受手术治疗,治疗时间长达23个月(从2001年1月至2002年11月),临床上诊断为后鼻孔出血。首先采用布莱顿鼻出血球囊进行前后填塞的初步治疗(n = 8);手术过程中有时需要联合结扎筛动脉(n = 4)。
出血得到控制且无复发是普遍情况(n = 9)。有1例因治疗失败需要进行介入放射学栓塞作为补充治疗。术后平均住院时间为2.1天。未观察到术后并发症。
经鼻内镜烧灼蝶腭动脉治疗严重后鼻孔出血是一种可靠的干预措施。在我们科室,当传统填塞治疗失败后,其作用已得到明确界定。