Yeung-Lai-Wah J A, Murdock C J, Boone J, Kerr C R
Department of Medicine, University Hospital-UBC Site, Vancouver, Canada.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Sep;20(3):547-51. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90006-9.
The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of combined therapy with propafenone and mexiletine for control of sustained ventricular tachycardia.
Combination antiarrhythmic drug therapy may enhance efficacy and lead to control of ventricular arrhythmias in some patients. Few reports have studied the combination of class IB and class IC drugs. Thus, this study was designed to investigate a combination of mexiletine and propafenone in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia.
Sixteen patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia had their clinical arrhythmia induced by programmed stimulation. Procainamide and propafenone alone failed to prevent reinduction of tachycardia in all. Mexiletine was subsequently added to propafenone and programmed stimulation was repeated.
With combination therapy ventricular tachycardia was noninducible in three patients (19%). A fourth who had presented with polymorphic ventricular tachycardia had slow bundle branch reentry (cycle length 500 ms) induced. In the other 12, tachycardia cycle length increased from 262 +/- 60 ms at baseline to 350 +/- 82 ms with propafenone and to 390 +/- 80 ms with propafenone plus mexiletine (p less than 0.0001 compared with baseline). Hemodynamic deterioration requiring defibrillation occurred in six patients at baseline study, in five taking propafenone and in two taking both drugs.
The combination of propafenone and mexiletine is effective in suppressing the induction of ventricular tachycardia in some patients refractory to procainamide and propafenone alone. In those in whom ventricular tachycardia could still be induced, the rate was slower and hemodynamically tolerated.
本研究旨在探讨普罗帕酮与美西律联合治疗对持续性室性心动过速的控制效果。
联合抗心律失常药物治疗可能会提高疗效,并使部分患者的室性心律失常得到控制。关于IB类和IC类药物联合使用的报道较少。因此,本研究旨在调查美西律与普罗帕酮联合治疗难治性室性心动过速患者的疗效。
16例持续性室性心动过速患者通过程序刺激诱发临床心律失常。单独使用普鲁卡因胺和普罗帕酮均未能防止所有患者心动过速的再次诱发。随后在普罗帕酮基础上加用美西律,并重复程序刺激。
联合治疗后,3例患者(19%)的室性心动过速不能被诱发。第4例患者出现多形性室性心动过速,诱发了缓慢的束支折返(周长500毫秒)。在其他12例患者中,心动过速周长从基线时的262±60毫秒增加到使用普罗帕酮时的350±82毫秒,再增加到使用普罗帕酮加美西律时的390±80毫秒(与基线相比,p<0.0001)。在基线研究时有6例患者出现需要除颤的血流动力学恶化,使用普罗帕酮时有5例,使用两种药物时有2例。
普罗帕酮与美西律联合使用对单独使用普鲁卡因胺和普罗帕酮无效的部分难治性室性心动过速患者,在抑制室性心动过速诱发方面有效。对于仍能诱发室性心动过速的患者,其发作频率较慢且血流动力学可耐受。