Moussa Issam, Leon Martin B, Baim Donald S, O'Neill William W, Popma Jeffery J, Buchbinder Maurice, Midwall Jay, Simonton Charles A, Keim Emily, Wang Patrick, Kuntz Richard E, Moses Jeffrey W
Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 130 East 77th St, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Circulation. 2004 May 18;109(19):2273-8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000129767.45513.71. Epub 2004 May 3.
Randomized clinical trials have shown that a sirolimus-eluting stent significantly reduces restenosis after percutaneous coronary revascularization. Diabetic patients are known to have a higher risk of restenosis compared with nondiabetic patients. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the impact of sirolimus-eluting stents on outcomes of diabetic compared with nondiabetic patients.
The SIRIUS (SIRolImUS-coated Bx Velocity balloon-expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions) trial is a randomized, double-blind study that compared sirolimus-eluting and bare metal stent implantation in 1058 patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions. Diabetes mellitus was present in 279 (26%) patients (diabetes mellitus group, 131 patients received sirolimus-eluting stents and 148 patients received bare metal stents) and was absent in 778 patients (no-diabetes mellitus group, 402 patients received sirolimus-eluting stents and 376 patients received bare metal stents). At 270 days, target lesion revascularization was reduced in diabetic patients from 22.3% with bare metal stents to 6.9% with sirolimus-eluting stents (P<0.001) and in nondiabetic patients from 14.1% to 2.99% (P<0.001), respectively. Major adverse cardiac events were reduced in diabetic patients from 25% with bare metal stents to 9.2% with sirolimus-eluting stents (P<0.001) and from 16.5% to 6.5% (P<0.001) in nondiabetic patients, respectively.
Implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents in de novo coronary lesions reduces major adverse cardiac events in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. However, among patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stents, there remains a trend toward a higher frequency of repeat intervention in diabetic patients compared with nondiabetic patients, particularly in the insulin-requiring patients.
随机临床试验表明,雷帕霉素洗脱支架可显著降低经皮冠状动脉血运重建术后的再狭窄率。已知糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者相比,再狭窄风险更高。本分析的目的是确定雷帕霉素洗脱支架对糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者治疗结果的影响。
西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉原发病变的随机、双盲研究(SIRIUS试验)比较了1058例冠状动脉原发病变患者植入雷帕霉素洗脱支架和裸金属支架的效果。279例(26%)患者患有糖尿病(糖尿病组,131例患者接受雷帕霉素洗脱支架,148例患者接受裸金属支架),778例患者无糖尿病(非糖尿病组,402例患者接受雷帕霉素洗脱支架,376例患者接受裸金属支架)。在270天时,糖尿病患者的靶病变血运重建率从裸金属支架组的22.3%降至雷帕霉素洗脱支架组的6.9%(P<0.001),非糖尿病患者从14.1%降至2.99%(P<0.001)。糖尿病患者的主要不良心脏事件从裸金属支架组的25%降至雷帕霉素洗脱支架组的9.2%(P<0.001),非糖尿病患者从16.5%降至6.5%(P<0.001)。
在冠状动脉原发病变中,与裸金属支架相比,植入雷帕霉素洗脱支架可降低糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的主要不良心脏事件。然而,在接受雷帕霉素洗脱支架的患者中,与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者尤其是需要胰岛素治疗的患者重复干预的频率仍有升高趋势。