Unlü N, Cobankara F K, Altinöz C, Ozer F
Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Selçuk, Konya, Turkey.
J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Jan;31(1):57-61.
In this study, the effects of home bleaching agents that contains carbamide peroxide (in different concentrations such as 10 and 15%) on the surface hardness of human enamel and dentine were evaluated. The buccal surfaces of 90 recently extracted human mandibular anterior teeth were used. The specimens in the dentine group were ground to expose of dentine surface. Then, samples in both enamel and dentine group were randomly divided into six main groups with 15 in each group. In the group 1 and 4, 15% carbamide peroxide was applied to the enamel and dentine surfaces and then the teeth were left in an incubator at 37 degrees C and 100% humidity for 4 h first, then left 28 h after repeating the same procedures seven times. The teeth were treated with 10% carbamide peroxide in groups 2 and 5 and distilled water in groups 3 and 6 (control groups), using the same procedures. Vicker's microhardness of enamel and dentine were assessed on each tooth before and after each treatment period (4 and 28 h). The hardness of control group specimens was also obtained after 4 h in distilled water and then after 28 h. For statistical analysis one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests were used. For both 10 and 15%, there were no statistically significant differences between the untreated control specimens and the specimens treated with the bleaching materials for enamel and dentine at any given measurement time (P > 0.05). Nevertheless, in vivo use of bleaching agents on tooth hard tissues requires further analysis.
在本研究中,评估了含有不同浓度(如10%和15%)过氧化脲的家庭漂白剂对人牙釉质和牙本质表面硬度的影响。使用了90颗近期拔除的人下颌前牙的颊面。牙本质组的标本经过研磨以暴露牙本质表面。然后,牙釉质组和牙本质组的样本被随机分为六个主要组,每组15个。在第1组和第4组中,将15%的过氧化脲应用于牙釉质和牙本质表面,然后将牙齿首先置于37摄氏度、湿度100%的培养箱中4小时,之后重复相同程序七次,再放置28小时。第2组和第5组使用10%的过氧化脲处理牙齿,第3组和第6组(对照组)使用蒸馏水,采用相同程序。在每个处理阶段(4小时和28小时)前后评估每颗牙齿的牙釉质和牙本质的维氏显微硬度。对照组标本在蒸馏水中放置4小时后以及28小时后也获取硬度数据。统计分析采用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验。对于10%和15%的浓度,在任何给定测量时间,未处理的对照标本与用漂白材料处理的牙釉质和牙本质标本之间均无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,在牙齿硬组织上体内使用漂白剂仍需要进一步分析。