Safar Michel E
Centre de diagnostic, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, 1, place du Parvis Notre-Dame, 75181 Paris 04, France.
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2004 Jun;6(3):190-4. doi: 10.1007/s11906-004-0068-7.
Peak-systolic blood pressure (SBP) and end-diastolic blood pressure (DBP) have been considered the exclusive mechanical factors predicting cardiovascular (CV) risk in populations of normotensive and hypertensive subjects. The purpose of this review is to show that in addition to SBP and DBP, other hemodynamic indices that have particular relevance for coronary complications and originate from pulse pressure (PP) should be taken into account, namely brachial PP and, potentially, heart rate (HR). In normotensive and hypertensive populations, increased PP is an independent predictor for myocardial infarction, more powerful than SBP, even in hypertensive subjects under successful antihypertensive drug therapy. Increased HR is an additional CV risk factor, acting particularly through the presence of an enhanced PP x HR product. Such findings, observed during a period in which standard antihypertensive agents are known to reduce SBP and PP to a much lesser extent than DBP, require the development of intervention trials using drugs acting specifically on SBP, PP, and arterial stiffness.
收缩压峰值(SBP)和舒张压末期(DBP)一直被认为是预测正常血压和高血压人群心血管(CV)风险的唯一机械因素。本综述的目的是表明,除了SBP和DBP之外,其他与冠状动脉并发症特别相关且源自脉压(PP)的血流动力学指标也应予以考虑,即肱动脉PP,以及可能的心率(HR)。在正常血压和高血压人群中,PP升高是心肌梗死的独立预测因素,比SBP更具影响力,即使在成功接受抗高血压药物治疗的高血压患者中也是如此。HR升高是另一个心血管危险因素,尤其通过PP×HR乘积升高起作用。在已知标准抗高血压药物降低SBP和PP的程度远小于降低DBP的时期观察到的这些发现,需要开展使用专门作用于SBP、PP和动脉僵硬度的药物的干预试验。