Suppr超能文献

无论基线脉压如何,氨氯地平+贝那普利优于氢氯噻嗪+贝那普利:ACCOMPLISH试验的亚组分析

Amlodipine+benazepril is superior to hydrochlorothiazide+benazepril irrespective of baseline pulse pressure: subanalysis of the ACCOMPLISH trial.

作者信息

Skoglund Per H, Svensson Per, Asp Joline, Dahlöf Björn, Kjeldsen Sverre E, Jamerson Kenneth A, Weber Michael A, Jia Yan, Zappe Dion H, Östergren Jan

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015 Feb;17(2):141-6. doi: 10.1111/jch.12460. Epub 2014 Dec 22.

Abstract

Pulse pressure (PP) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease and death but few studies have investigated the effect of antihypertensive treatments in relation to PP levels before treatment. The Avoiding Cardiovascular Events Through Combination Therapy in Patients Living With Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial showed that the combination of benazepril+amlodipine (B+A) is superior to benazepril+hydrochlorothiazide (B+H) in reducing CV events. We aimed to investigate whether the treatment effects in the ACCOMPLISH trial were dependent on baseline PP. High-risk hypertensive patients (n=11,499) were randomized to double-blinded treatment with single-pill combinations of either B+A or B+H and followed for 36 months. Patients were divided into tertiles according to their baseline PP and events (CV mortality/myocardial infarction or stroke) were compared. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the treatment effect (B+A over B+H) were calculated in a Cox regression model with age, coronary artery disease, and diabetes mellitus as covariates and were compared across the tertiles. The event rate was increased in the high tertile of PP compared with the low tertile (7.2% vs 4.4% P<.01). In the high and medium PP tertiles, HRs were 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.95; P=.018) and 0.74 (CI, 0.56-0.98, P=.034), respectively, in favor of B+A. There was no significant difference between the treatments in the low tertile and no significant differences in treatment effect when comparing the HRs between tertiles of PP. B+A has superior CV protection over B+H in high-risk hypertensive patients independent of baseline PP although the absolute treatment effect is enhanced in the higher tertiles of PP where event rates are higher.

摘要

脉压(PP)是心血管(CV)疾病和死亡的独立危险因素,但很少有研究调查降压治疗对治疗前PP水平的影响。收缩期高血压患者联合治疗预防心血管事件(ACCOMPLISH)试验表明,贝那普利+氨氯地平(B+A)联合用药在降低CV事件方面优于贝那普利+氢氯噻嗪(B+H)。我们旨在研究ACCOMPLISH试验中的治疗效果是否取决于基线PP。将高危高血压患者(n=11499)随机分为接受B+A或B+H单丸联合用药的双盲治疗组,并随访36个月。根据患者的基线PP将其分为三分位数,并比较事件(CV死亡率/心肌梗死或中风)。在以年龄、冠状动脉疾病和糖尿病为协变量的Cox回归模型中计算治疗效果(B+A优于B+H)的风险比(HR),并在三分位数之间进行比较。与低三分位数相比,高PP三分位数的事件发生率增加(7.2%对4.4%,P<0.01)。在高PP和中PP三分位数中,支持B+A的HR分别为0.75(95%置信区间[CI],0.60-0.95;P=0.018)和0.74(CI,0.56-0.98,P=0.034)。低三分位数的治疗组之间无显著差异,比较PP三分位数之间的HR时治疗效果也无显著差异。在高危高血压患者中,B+A比B+H具有更好的心血管保护作用,且独立于基线PP,尽管在事件发生率较高的高PP三分位数中绝对治疗效果有所增强。

相似文献

3
Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 4;359(23):2417-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806182.
4
Comparison of benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide in high-risk patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease.
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 15;112(2):255-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.026. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
8
Efficacy and duration of benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide on 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure control.
Hypertension. 2011 Feb;57(2):174-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.159939. Epub 2010 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Antihypertensive Treatment Patterns in CKD Stages 3 and 4: The CKD-REIN Cohort Study.
Kidney Med. 2024 Oct 9;6(12):100912. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100912. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Formulations of Amlodipine: A Review.
J Pharm (Cairo). 2016;2016:8961621. doi: 10.1155/2016/8961621. Epub 2016 Oct 16.

本文引用的文献

4
Systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes during treatment of hypertension.
Am J Med. 2013 Jun;126(6):501-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
5
The importance of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients at risk of cardiovascular events.
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2013 Mar;20(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s40292-013-0006-3. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
6
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: recent evidence and clinical pharmacy applications.
Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Jan;33(1):69-83. doi: 10.1002/phar.1167.
8
Efficacy and duration of benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide on 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure control.
Hypertension. 2011 Feb;57(2):174-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.159939. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
9
Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with central haemodynamics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur Heart J. 2010 Aug;31(15):1865-71. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq024. Epub 2010 Mar 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验