Gruchała Marcin, Bhardwaj Shalini, Pajusola Katri, Roy Himadri, Rissanen Tuomas T, Kokina Ilze, Kholová Ivana, Markkanen Johanna E, Rutanen Juha, Heikura Tommi, Alitalo Kari, Büeler Hansruedi, Ylä-Herttuala Seppo
Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, A. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Kuopio, Finland.
J Gene Med. 2004 May;6(5):545-54. doi: 10.1002/jgm.535.
Gene transfer offers considerable potential for altering vessel wall physiology and intervention in vascular disease. Therefore, there is great interest in developing optimal strategies and vectors for efficient, targeted gene delivery into a vessel wall.
We studied adeno-associated viruses (AAV; 9 x 10(8) to 4 x 10(9) TU/ml) for their usefulness to transduce rabbit arteries in vivo in comparison with adenoviruses (Adv; 1 x 10(9) to 1 x 10(10) pfu/ml). 100 microl of viruses or placebo solution were injected intraluminally into transiently isolated carotid segments.
In normal arteries AAV transduced mainly medial smooth muscle cells (SMC) while Adv transduced exclusively endothelial cells (EC). Mechanical injury to EC layer and internal elastic lamina enabled Adv to penetrate and transduce medial SMC. Transgene expression in EC after the AAV-mediated gene transfer was very low. The use of the EC-specific Tie-1 promoter did not lead to specific transgene expression in EC. Transgene expression in SMC persisted for at least 100 days after the AAV treatment whereas the Adv-mediated effect diminished in 14 days. AAV caused only a modest increase in EC VCAM-1 expression and proliferation rate of vascular cells as compared with the mock-treated arteries while Adv caused an extensive inflammatory cell infiltration, VCAM-1 expression, vascular cell proliferation and morphological damages.
Significant differences were observed between the AAV and the Adv vectors in their patterns of arterial transduction and consequent inflammatory responses. These distinct properties may be utilized for different applications in vascular biology research and gene therapy for cardiovascular diseases.
基因转移在改变血管壁生理功能及干预血管疾病方面具有巨大潜力。因此,人们对开发高效、靶向性的基因递送策略及载体以将基因有效导入血管壁有着浓厚兴趣。
我们研究了腺相关病毒(AAV;9×10⁸至4×10⁹ TU/ml)与腺病毒(Adv;1×10⁹至1×10¹⁰ pfu/ml)相比,在体内转导兔动脉的效用。将100微升病毒或安慰剂溶液经腔内注射到短暂分离的颈动脉节段。
在正常动脉中,AAV主要转导中膜平滑肌细胞(SMC),而Adv仅转导内皮细胞(EC)。对EC层和内弹性膜的机械损伤使Adv能够穿透并转导中膜SMC。AAV介导的基因转移后EC中的转基因表达非常低。使用EC特异性Tie-1启动子未导致EC中特异性转基因表达。AAV处理后SMC中的转基因表达持续至少100天,而Adv介导的效应在14天内减弱。与模拟处理的动脉相比,AAV仅使EC VCAM-1表达和血管细胞增殖率适度增加,而Adv则导致广泛的炎症细胞浸润、VCAM-1表达、血管细胞增殖和形态损伤。
在动脉转导模式及随之而来的炎症反应方面,观察到AAV和Adv载体之间存在显著差异。这些不同特性可用于血管生物学研究和心血管疾病基因治疗的不同应用。