Irish Ashley
Department of Nephrology, Royal Perth Hospital, Western Australia.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2004;4(3):139-49. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200404030-00001.
Renal transplantation improves survival and quality of life for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Improvements in immunosuppressive therapy have reduced early allograft loss due to acute rejection to very low levels. Early allograft loss, due to acute thrombotic complications, remains a constant and proportionally increasing complication of renal transplantation. Identifying risk factor(s) for thrombosis amenable to preventive strategies has been elusive. Epidemiological studies have attempted to define risk in terms of modifiable (drugs, dialysis modality, surgical procedure) and non-modifiable (age, diabetes mellitus, vascular anomalies) factors, or identify changes in coagulation or fibrinolysis promoting a more thrombotic state. Most recently the evolution of thrombophilia research has established the potential for inherited hypercoagulability to predispose to acute allograft thrombosis. Inheritance of the factor V Leiden (FVL), prothrombin G20210A mutation, or the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) may increase the risk of renal allograft thrombosis approximately 3-fold in selected patients. Patients with ESRD due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) appear at particularly high risk of thrombosis, especially if they have either APA or detectable beta(2)-glycoprotein-1. Data for other hypercoagulable states such as hyperhomocystinemia or the C677T polymorphism of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are deficient. Patients with APA, FVL, or prothrombin G20210A mutation also appear to have greater graft loss due to vascular rejection, possibly reflecting immunological injury upon the vascular wall exacerbated or induced by the prothrombotic state. While substantial in vitro data suggest cyclosporine is prothrombotic, an independent clinical association with allograft thrombosis is unproven. Interventions to reduce thrombotic risk including heparin, warfarin, and aspirin have been evaluated in both selected high-risk groups (heparin and warfarin) and unselected populations (heparin and aspirin). In unselected patients at low clinical risk, aspirin (75-150 mg/day) with or without a short period of unfractionated heparin (5000U twice a day for 5 days) appears to reduce the risk of renal allograft thrombosis significantly with a low risk of bleeding, especially when compared with low molecular weight heparins which risk accumulation in renal failure. In high-risk groups (identified thrombophilic risk factor, previous thrombosis, or SLE) longer period of heparin, with or without aspirin and maintenance with warfarin, should be considered. Re-transplantation following graft loss due to vascular thrombosis can be undertaken with a low risk of recurrence. Further prospective studies evaluating both putative risk factors and intervention strategies are required to determine whether routine clinical screening for thrombophilic factors is justified.
肾移植可提高终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的生存率和生活质量。免疫抑制治疗的改进已将急性排斥导致的早期移植肾丢失率降低至极低水平。然而,急性血栓形成并发症导致的早期移植肾丢失仍然是肾移植中持续存在且比例不断增加的并发症。确定适合预防策略的血栓形成危险因素一直很困难。流行病学研究试图从可改变因素(药物、透析方式、手术操作)和不可改变因素(年龄、糖尿病、血管异常)方面来界定风险,或识别促进血栓形成状态的凝血或纤溶变化。最近,血栓形成倾向研究的进展已证实遗传性高凝状态易导致急性移植肾血栓形成。因子V莱顿(FVL)突变、凝血酶原G20210A突变或抗磷脂抗体(APA)的存在可能会使特定患者发生肾移植血栓形成的风险增加约3倍。因系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)导致ESRD的患者似乎血栓形成风险特别高,尤其是如果他们同时存在APA或可检测到的β2糖蛋白-1。关于其他高凝状态,如高同型半胱氨酸血症或亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶基因C677T多态性的数据不足。存在APA、FVL或凝血酶原G20210A突变的患者似乎也因血管排斥导致移植肾丢失更多,这可能反映了血栓前状态加剧或诱发的血管壁免疫损伤。虽然大量体外数据表明环孢素具有促血栓形成作用,但尚未证实其与移植肾血栓形成存在独立的临床关联。已在特定高危组(肝素和华法林)和未选择人群(肝素和阿司匹林)中评估了降低血栓形成风险的干预措施,包括肝素、华法林和阿司匹林。在临床风险较低的未选择患者中,阿司匹林(75 - 150毫克/天)联合或不联合短期普通肝素(5000单位,每日两次,共5天)似乎可显著降低肾移植血栓形成风险,且出血风险较低,尤其是与有在肾衰竭中蓄积风险的低分子量肝素相比。在高危组(已识别的血栓形成倾向危险因素、既往血栓形成或SLE)中,应考虑使用更长疗程的肝素,联合或不联合阿司匹林,并使用华法林维持治疗。因血管血栓形成导致移植肾丢失后的再次移植复发风险较低。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来评估假定的危险因素和干预策略,以确定对血栓形成倾向因素进行常规临床筛查是否合理。