Suppr超能文献

乳制品样品中金黄色葡萄球菌肠毒素浓缩的超滤法与三氯乙酸沉淀法比较

Comparison between ultrafiltration and trichloroacetic acid precipitation method for concentration of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin in dairy samples.

作者信息

Soejima T, Nagao E, Kubota T, Yamagata H, Kagi H

机构信息

Analytical Research Center, Morinaga Milk Industry Co. Ltd., 5-1-83, Higashihara, Zama City, Kanagawa 228-8583, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 Jun 1;93(2):185-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.11.005.

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin that may be contained at low concentrations in milk and dairy products can cause food poisoning. To detect this enterotoxin at low concentrations, samples should be concentrated. We evaluated the performance of centrifugal ultrafiltration method (UF) in comparison with trichloroacetic acid precipitation method (TCA) for the concentration of S. aureus enterotoxin in milk and dairy products. S. aureus enterotoxin A (SEA) were added at various concentrations to ultra high-temperature heating process (UHT) milk, UHT concentrated skim milk, UHT skim milk powder, low heat-treated (LH) skim milk powder, and raw milk. SEA was concentrated by TCA and UF once a day on a total of 3 days by different researchers to prepare test solutions. The fluorescence value (TV) of test solutions was determined using an immunofluorescence autoanalyzer (miniVIDAS), and the linearity and slope of the regression line, relative standard deviation (RSD(RW)) at each added concentration, detection limit (DL), quantification limit (QL), and the recovery rate by each concentration method were obtained according to the guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH). The slope of the regression line obtained by UF was steeper than that by TCA for all dairy samples excluding LH (74 degrees C, 20 s) skim milk powder. RSDRW, DL, and QL obtained by UF were comparable to or more excellent than those obtained by TCA. The procedure of UF was simpler than that of TCA. The recovery rate and rapidity were similar between the two methods. The DL and QL of enterotoxins other than SEA in dairy products by UF or TCA were estimated based on the DL and QL of SEA. In this estimation, consideration was given to reactions between each enterotoxin and its antibody, and also to the immunoactivity maintenance rate of each enterotoxin after addition of trichloroacetic acid in TCA. The estimated values were similar to those obtained by experiments using enterotoxin C1 (SEC1). UF using a centrifugal ultrafiltration membrane can be more readily performed and similar to or more reliable than TCA. UF combined with a miniVIDAS can be used for quantitative routine analysis.

摘要

金黄色葡萄球菌肠毒素可能以低浓度存在于牛奶和乳制品中,可导致食物中毒。为了检测低浓度的这种肠毒素,样品应进行浓缩。我们评估了离心超滤法(UF)与三氯乙酸沉淀法(TCA)相比,在浓缩牛奶和乳制品中金黄色葡萄球菌肠毒素方面的性能。将不同浓度的金黄色葡萄球菌肠毒素A(SEA)添加到超高温加热处理(UHT)牛奶、UHT浓缩脱脂牛奶、UHT脱脂奶粉、低热处理(LH)脱脂奶粉和生牛奶中。不同研究人员每天通过TCA和UF对SEA进行一次浓缩,共进行3天,以制备测试溶液。使用免疫荧光自动分析仪(miniVIDAS)测定测试溶液的荧光值(TV),并根据国际协调会议(ICH)的指南获得回归线的线性和斜率、各添加浓度下的相对标准偏差(RSD(RW))、检测限(DL)、定量限(QL)以及每种浓缩方法的回收率。对于除LH(74℃,20秒)脱脂奶粉外的所有乳制品样品,UF获得的回归线斜率比TCA更陡。UF获得的RSDRW、DL和QL与TCA相当或更优。UF的操作程序比TCA更简单。两种方法的回收率和速度相似。基于SEA的DL和QL估计了UF或TCA对乳制品中除SEA以外的其他肠毒素的DL和QL。在该估计中,考虑了每种肠毒素与其抗体之间的反应,以及TCA中添加三氯乙酸后每种肠毒素的免疫活性维持率。估计值与使用肠毒素C1(SEC1)进行实验获得的值相似。使用离心超滤膜的UF操作更简便,与TCA相似或更可靠。UF与miniVIDAS结合可用于定量常规分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验