Singh Manish
Department of Psychology and Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, 152 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA.
Vision Res. 2004;44(15):1827-42. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.02.010.
Asymmetric lightness matching was employed to measure how the visual system assigns lightness to surface patches seen through partially-transmissive surfaces. Observers adjusted the luminance of a comparison patch seen through transparency, in order to match the lightness of a standard patch seen in plain view. Plots of matched-to-standard luminance were linear, and their slopes were consistent with Metelli's alpha. A control experiment confirmed that these matches were indeed transparency based. Consistent with recent results, however, when observers directly matched the transmittance of transparent surfaces, their matches deviated strongly and systematically from Metelli's alpha. Although the two sets of results appear to be contradictory, formal analysis reveals a deeper mutual consistency in the representation of the two layers. A ratio-of-contrasts model is shown to explain both the success of Metelli's model in predicting lightness through transparency, and its failure to predict perceived transmittance--and hence is seen to play the primary role in perceptual transparency.
采用非对称明度匹配来测量视觉系统如何将明度赋予透过部分透射表面看到的表面斑块。观察者调整透过透明介质看到的比较斑块的亮度,以匹配在普通视野中看到的标准斑块的明度。匹配到标准亮度的图是线性的,其斜率与梅泰利的α一致。一项对照实验证实,这些匹配确实基于透明度。然而,与最近的结果一致,当观察者直接匹配透明表面的透射率时,他们的匹配结果与梅泰利的α有很大且系统的偏差。尽管这两组结果似乎相互矛盾,但形式分析揭示了两层表示中更深层次的相互一致性。一个对比度比率模型被证明既可以解释梅泰利模型在预测透过透明度的明度方面的成功,也可以解释其在预测感知透射率方面的失败——因此被认为在感知透明度中起主要作用。