• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝门部胆管癌的扩大肝切除术:46例患者分析

Major hepatic resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of 46 patients.

作者信息

Rea David J, Munoz-Juarez Manuel, Farnell Michael B, Donohue John H, Que Florencia G, Crownhart Brian, Larson Dirk, Nagorney David M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterologic and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 2004 May;139(5):514-23; discussion 523-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.5.514.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.139.5.514
PMID:15136352
Abstract

HYPOTHESIS

Major hepatectomy, bile duct resection, and regional lymphadenectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma are associated with actual long-term (>5 years) survival.

DESIGN

Retrospective outcome study.

SETTING

Single tertiary referral institution.

PATIENTS

Between 1979 and 1997, 46 consecutive patients had resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma by major hepatectomy, bile duct resection, and regional lymphadenectomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival and tumor recurrence were correlated to clinicopathological factors, operative morbidity, and mortality.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients underwent left hepatectomy, 17 underwent right hepatectomy, and 4 had extended right hepatectomy. Eighteen patients underwent resection of segment 1. Negative (R0) resection margins were achieved in 37 patients (80%). The operative mortality rate was 9%, and the surgical morbidity rate was 52%. Actual 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 80%, 39%, and 26%, respectively. Factors adversely associated with patient survival rates included: male sex, lymph node metastases, tumor grade 3 or 4, elevated direct serum bilirubin level at diagnosis, elevated preoperative activated partial thromboplastin time, and more than 4 U of red blood cells transfused perioperatively. Tumor size and R0 resection approached significance for survival. Factors associated with tumor recurrence included: male sex, tumor grade 3 or 4, a low hemoglobin level both at diagnosis and preoperatively, and a low preoperative prothrombin time and low alkaline phosphatase level at diagnosis and preoperatively. Median time to recurrence was 3.6 years. Tumor recurrence was predominantly local and regional.

CONCLUSIONS

The actual 5-year survival rate of 26% justifies major partial hepatectomy, bile duct resection, and regional lymphadenectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The high frequency of local and regional recurrence warrants investigation of adjuvant therapy.

摘要

假设

肝门部胆管癌的扩大肝切除术、胆管切除术及区域淋巴结清扫术与实际长期(>5年)生存率相关。

设计

回顾性结局研究。

地点

单一的三级转诊机构。

患者

1979年至1997年间,46例连续患者接受了扩大肝切除术、胆管切除术及区域淋巴结清扫术以切除肝门部胆管癌。

主要结局指标

总生存率和肿瘤复发与临床病理因素、手术发病率及死亡率相关。

结果

25例患者接受左肝切除术,17例接受右肝切除术,4例接受扩大右肝切除术。18例患者接受了第1肝段切除术。37例患者(80%)切缘阴性(R0)。手术死亡率为9%,手术发病率为52%。实际1年、3年和5年生存率分别为80%、39%和26%。与患者生存率呈负相关的因素包括:男性、淋巴结转移、肿瘤分级为3级或4级、诊断时血清直接胆红素水平升高、术前活化部分凝血活酶时间延长及围手术期输注红细胞超过4单位。肿瘤大小和R0切除对生存率接近有显著意义。与肿瘤复发相关的因素包括:男性、肿瘤分级为3级或4级、诊断时及术前血红蛋白水平低、术前凝血酶原时间低以及诊断时及术前碱性磷酸酶水平低。复发的中位时间为3.6年。肿瘤复发主要为局部和区域复发。

结论

26%的实际5年生存率证明了肝门部胆管癌行扩大肝部分切除术、胆管切除术及区域淋巴结清扫术的合理性。局部和区域复发的高频率值得对辅助治疗进行研究。

相似文献

1
Major hepatic resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of 46 patients.肝门部胆管癌的扩大肝切除术:46例患者分析
Arch Surg. 2004 May;139(5):514-23; discussion 523-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.5.514.
2
Resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: concomitant liver resection decreases hepatic recurrence.肝门部胆管癌切除术:同期肝切除可降低肝内复发率。
Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):273-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2bfd.
3
[Prognostic factors and long term outcome after surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Univariate and multivariate analysis].[肝门部胆管癌手术后的预后因素及长期结果。单因素和多因素分析]
Chir Ital. 2004 Nov-Dec;56(6):749-59.
4
Prognostic factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after hepatic resection: univariate and multivariate analysis.肝切除术后肝内胆管癌的预后因素:单因素和多因素分析
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Mar-Apr;49(44):311-6.
5
Prognosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: hilar bile duct cancer versus intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma involving the hepatic hilus.肝门部胆管癌的预后:肝门部胆管癌与累及肝门的肝内胆管癌
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Feb;15(2):590-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9687-y. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
6
Surgical approach to bismuth Type I and II hilar cholangiocarcinomas: audit of 54 consecutive cases.针对比氏I型和II型肝门部胆管癌的手术方法:对54例连续病例的审计
Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):1052-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318142d97e.
7
Procedure of extended hilar bile duct resection and its application for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.肝门部胆管扩大切除术的手术步骤及其在肝门部胆管癌中的应用
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Mar-Apr;49(44):300-5.
8
Aggressive surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: is it justified? Audit of a single center's experience.肝门部胆管癌的积极手术切除:是否合理?单中心经验的审计
Am J Surg. 2008 Aug;196(2):160-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.033. Epub 2008 May 7.
9
Combined vascular resection in operative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does it work or not?肝门部胆管癌手术切除中的联合血管切除:是否有效?
Surgery. 2007 May;141(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.09.016. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
10
Extended bile duct resection and [corrected] liver and transplantation in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: long-term results.肝门部胆管癌行扩大胆管切除和[校正]肝移植:长期结果。
Liver Transpl. 2009 Nov;15(11):1499-507. doi: 10.1002/lt.21887.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Factors and Survival Outcomes in Resected Biliary Tract Cancers: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.切除的胆管癌的预后因素和生存结果:一项多中心回顾性分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;17(15):2445. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152445.
2
Comparison of prognostic factors and their differences in intrahepatic, hilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.肝内、肝门部和肝外胆管癌预后因素及其差异的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Jul 15;17(7):107995. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.107995.
3
Improved Outcomes Following Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A 27-Year Experience.
肝门部胆管癌切除术后改善的预后:27年经验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun;32(6):4352-4362. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17075-5. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
4
Initial investigation on ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy of lesions in the first hepatic hilum with fusion of ultrasound and multimodal imaging cognitive guidance.超声与多模态影像认知融合引导下经皮穿刺活检肝门部病变的初步研究
Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 24;14:1297153. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1297153. eCollection 2024.
5
Survival outcome of surgical resection compared to non-resection for Bismuth type IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.手术切除与非手术切除治疗 Bismuth Ⅳ型肝门部胆管癌的生存结局比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jun 8;408(1):229. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02965-7.
6
Ablative Therapy in Non-HCC Liver Malignancy.非肝细胞癌肝脏恶性肿瘤的消融治疗
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 14;15(4):1200. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041200.
7
Anatomic patterns of recurrence in biliary tract cancers: does primary tumor site matter?胆管癌复发的解剖学模式:原发肿瘤部位重要吗?
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Jun;13(3):1413-1422. doi: 10.21037/jgo-21-868.
8
Clinical outcomes for hilar and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with adjuvant, definitive, or liver transplant-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy strategies: a single-center experience.采用辅助、根治性或基于肝移植的新辅助放化疗策略治疗肝门部和肝外胆管癌的临床结局:单中心经验
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Feb;13(1):288-297. doi: 10.21037/jgo-21-615.
9
Transplant Oncology: An Evolving Field in Cancer Care.移植肿瘤学:癌症治疗中一个不断发展的领域。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 29;13(19):4911. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194911.
10
Minimally invasive versus open radical resection surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparable outcomes associated with advantages of minimal invasiveness.微创与开放根治性切除术治疗肝门部胆管癌:微创优势与可比结局相关。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0248534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248534. eCollection 2021.