Suppr超能文献

基伦巴(布隆迪)癫痫的经济评估:一项病例对照研究。

Economic evaluation of epilepsy in Kiremba (Burundi): a case-control study.

作者信息

Nsengiyumva Georges, Druet-Cabanac Michel, Nzisabira Léopold, Preux Pierre-Marie, Vergnenègre Alain

机构信息

Institute of Neuroepidemiology and Tropical Neurology (EA 3174), Cluzeau Hospital, Limoges, France.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2004 Jun;45(6):673-7. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.36303.x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Epilepsy is a common disease whose prevalence across Africa is extremely variable (from 5 to 74 per thousand ). Its social and economic consequences in this continent are not well established. The objective of this study was to compare the cost of care of patients with epilepsy with that of controls in the commune of Kiremba in Burundi.

METHODS

The survey was carried out in the commune of Kiremba from March 1, 2001, to April 30, 2001. A sample of cases (patients with epilepsy) and controls was taken from the general population. The economic analysis was conducted from the viewpoint of the patient. Data collected were direct medical costs (consultations, admissions to hospital, complementary examinations, treatments) and indirect costs (evaluated from the number of days of family life disrupted).

RESULTS

In this study, 1,056 patients were included (352 patients with epilepsy and 704 controls). The total annual cost of patients with epilepsy was US dollars 11.0 against US dollars 7.3 for controls (p = 0.03). The indirect costs represented 75.8% of the total cost. For the people with epilepsy that took antiepileptic treatment (n = 18), the annual average total cost became US dollars 48.4. The number of disrupted days was 10.2 days (SD, 18.7 days) for the treated patients with epilepsy and 2.0 days (SD, 9.0 days) for the untreated ones (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Epilepsy was responsible for an extra cost: an increased direct cost along with more disruption of family life. This extra cost remained after adjustment for use of health care and antiepileptic treatments. Various measures could be envisioned to reduce the impact of indirect costs.

摘要

目的

癫痫是一种常见疾病,其在非洲各地的患病率差异极大(每千人口中为5至74例)。其在该大陆的社会和经济后果尚未完全明确。本研究的目的是比较布隆迪基伦巴社区癫痫患者与对照者的护理成本。

方法

该调查于2001年3月1日至2001年4月30日在基伦巴社区进行。从普通人群中抽取病例(癫痫患者)和对照样本。经济分析从患者角度进行。收集的数据包括直接医疗成本(会诊、住院、辅助检查、治疗)和间接成本(根据家庭生活中断天数评估)。

结果

本研究纳入了1056名患者(352例癫痫患者和704名对照者)。癫痫患者的年度总成本为11.0美元,而对照者为7.3美元(p = 0.03)。间接成本占总成本的75.8%。对于接受抗癫痫治疗的癫痫患者(n = 18),年度平均总成本变为48.4美元。接受治疗的癫痫患者家庭生活中断天数为10.2天(标准差,18.7天),未接受治疗的患者为2.0天(标准差,9.0天)(p < 0.001)。

结论

癫痫导致了额外成本:直接成本增加,同时家庭生活受到更多干扰。在对医疗保健和抗癫痫治疗的使用进行调整后,这种额外成本仍然存在。可以设想采取各种措施来减少间接成本的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验