Suppr超能文献

成人管理式医疗人群中抗癫痫药物治疗不依从的患病率及成本

Prevalence and cost of nonadherence with antiepileptic drugs in an adult managed care population.

作者信息

Davis Keith L, Candrilli Sean D, Edin Heather M

机构信息

Health Economics, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2008 Mar;49(3):446-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01414.x. Epub 2007 Nov 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study assessed the extent of refill nonadherence with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and the potential association between AED nonadherence and health care costs in an adult-managed care population.

METHODS

Retrospective claims from the PharMetrics database were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were: age > or =21, epilepsy diagnosis between January 01, 2000 and March 12, 2005, > or =2 AED prescriptions, and continuous health plan enrollment for > or =6 months prior to and > or =12 months following AED initiation. Adherence was evaluated using the medication possession ratio (MPR). Patients with an MPR <0.8 were classified as nonadherent. Multivariate regression was used to assess the effect of AED nonadherence on annualized cost outcomes. Regression covariates included patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and follow-up duration.

RESULTS

Among patients meeting all inclusion criteria (N = 10,892), 58% were female, mean age was 44 years, mean CCI was 0.94, and mean follow-up was 27 months. Mean MPR was 0.78 and 39% of patients were nonadherent. AED nonadherence was associated with an increased likelihood of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR]= 1.110, p = 0.013) and emergency room (ER) admission (OR = 1.479, p < 0.0001), as well as increased inpatient and ER costs of $1,799 and $260 (both p = 0.001), respectively, per patient per year. Outpatient and other ancillary costs were not significantly affected by nonadherence. A large net positive effect of nonadherence on total annual health care costs remained (+$1,466, p = 0.034) despite an offset from reduced prescription drug intake.

DISCUSSION

Adherence with AEDs among adult epilepsy patients is suboptimal and nonadherence appears to be associated with increased health care costs. Efforts to promote AED adherence may lead to cost savings for managed care systems.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了成人管理式医疗人群中抗癫痫药物(AEDs)的再填充不依从程度以及AED不依从与医疗保健成本之间的潜在关联。

方法

对PharMetrics数据库中的回顾性索赔数据进行分析。纳入标准为:年龄≥21岁,2000年1月1日至2005年3月12日期间诊断为癫痫,≥2次AED处方,以及在开始使用AED之前≥6个月和之后≥12个月持续参加健康计划。使用药物持有率(MPR)评估依从性。MPR<0.8的患者被归类为不依从。采用多变量回归评估AED不依从对年化成本结果的影响。回归协变量包括患者人口统计学特征、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)和随访时间。

结果

在符合所有纳入标准的患者中(N = 10892),58%为女性,平均年龄为44岁,平均CCI为0.94,平均随访时间为27个月。平均MPR为0.78,39%的患者不依从。AED不依从与住院可能性增加(优势比[OR]=1.110,p = 0.013)和急诊室(ER)就诊(OR = 1.479,p < 0.0001)相关,以及每位患者每年住院和ER费用分别增加1799美元和260美元(均p = 0.001)。门诊和其他辅助费用不受不依从的显著影响。尽管因减少处方药摄入量而有所抵消,但不依从对年度总医疗保健成本仍有较大的净正向影响(+$1466,p = 0.034)。

讨论

成人癫痫患者对AED的依从性欠佳,不依从似乎与医疗保健成本增加有关。促进AED依从性的努力可能会为管理式医疗系统节省成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验