Kramer M S, Guo T, Platt R W, Sevkovskaya Z, Dzikovich I, Collet J-P, Shapiro S, Chalmers B, Hodnett E, Vanilovich I, Mezen I, Ducruet T, Shishko G, Bogdanovich N
Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Canada.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 May;34(5):753-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.1940.x.
Frequent infection in infancy and early childhood has been hypothesized to explain the low prevalence of asthma and other atopic disease among children in developing countries (the so-called 'hygiene hypothesis'), but the low prevalence in Eastern Europe remains unexplained.
To test the hygiene hypothesis in the Republic of Belarus by examining the relationship between gastrointestinal (GI) and respiratory infection and two potentially atopic outcomes in the first 12 months of life: atopic eczema and recurrent wheeze. METHODS; We carried out two case-control studies nested within a large (n=17 046) randomized trial in Belarus, with cases defined as (1) first occurrence of atopic eczema (n=819) and (2) second episode of wheezing (n=112). Incidence density sampling was used to select four matched controls born within 1 month at the same hospital as the case. Exposure was defined as one or more episodes of GI or respiratory infection (examined separately) with onset >7 days before onset of the case's atopic outcome. Analyses controlled for family atopic history, duration of exclusive breastfeeding, sex, birth weight, maternal education, and (for recurrent wheeze) maternal smoking.
For atopic eczema, prior GI infection occurred in 7.4% of cases vs. 6.0% of controls [adjusted OR=1.27 (0.94-1.72)] and prior respiratory infection in 35.2% vs. 32.6% [adjusted OR=1.14 (95% CI=0.94-1.37)]. For recurrent wheeze, prior GI infection occurred in 9.8% of cases vs. 7.4% of controls [adjusted OR=1.30 (0.60-2.82)].
Our results do not support the hypothesis that infection protects against atopic eczema or recurrent wheezing in the first 12 months of life.
婴幼儿时期频繁感染被认为可以解释发展中国家儿童哮喘和其他过敏性疾病的低发病率(即所谓的“卫生假说”),但东欧地区的低发病率仍无法解释。
通过研究白俄罗斯共和国12个月内胃肠道(GI)和呼吸道感染与两种潜在过敏性结局(特应性皮炎和复发性喘息)之间的关系,检验卫生假说。方法:我们在白俄罗斯一项大型随机试验(n=17046)中开展了两项病例对照研究,病例定义为:(1)首次出现特应性皮炎(n=819);(2)第二次喘息发作(n=112)。采用发病密度抽样法,选取与病例在同一家医院出生、1个月内出生的4名匹配对照。暴露定义为在病例的过敏性结局发病前7天以上发生的一次或多次胃肠道或呼吸道感染(分别进行研究)。分析时对家族过敏史、纯母乳喂养持续时间、性别、出生体重、母亲教育程度以及(复发性喘息时)母亲吸烟情况进行了控制。
对于特应性皮炎,病例组先前发生胃肠道感染的比例为7.4%,对照组为6.0%[调整后的比值比(OR)=1.27(0.94-1.72)];先前发生呼吸道感染的比例分别为35.2%和32.6%[调整后的OR=1.14(95%置信区间=0.94-1.37)]。对于复发性喘息,病例组先前发生胃肠道感染的比例为9.8%,对照组为7.4%[调整后的OR=1.30(0.60-2.82)]。
我们的研究结果不支持感染可预防12个月内特应性皮炎或复发性喘息这一假说。