Suppr超能文献

通过指骨和跟骨定量超声及双能X线吸收法鉴别髋部骨折

Discrimination of hip fractures by quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry.

作者信息

Damilakis John, Papadokostakis George, Perisinakis Kostas, Maris Thomas, Dimitriou P, Hadjipavlou Alexander, Gourtsoyiannis Nicholas

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Iraklion, Crete, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2004 Jun;50(3):268-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.01.023.

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the ability of different techniques used for the assessment of bone status to discriminate between postmenopausal women with and without hip fracture. Fifty-one postmenopausal women (mean age 64.5 +/- 6.5) who had sustained a low energy hip fracture and 51 age-matched controls (mean age 64.6 +/- 6.0) were studied. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) assessment was carried out using the Ubis 3000 device capable of measuring broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound at the calcaneus (SOSC) and the Sunlight Omnisense device capable of estimating speed of sound at the phalanges (SOSP). Femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed using dual X-ray absorptiometry. Correlations between QUS variables ranged from r = 0.35 to 0.72 and between QUS variables and BMD from r = 0.30 to 0.36. BMD was the best discriminator of hip fractures (odds ratio = 3.61, area under curve = 0.824). All QUS variables were significant discriminators of hip fractures with odds ratios ranging from 1.88 to 2.63 and areas under the ROC curves ranging from 0.663 to 0.740. Among the QUS variables, the SOSP showed the best odds ratio and area under curve. Comparison between the areas under the ROC curve did not show any significant difference between SOSP, BUA and BMD. On the contrary, the difference between SOSC and BMD was significant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, BMD and QUS variables investigated in the current study were significant discriminators of hip fractures. The differentiation of the hip fractures by BMD was significantly better than that of BUA measured at the calcaneus. Moreover, BMD discriminated fractured patients better than BUA and SOS(P), although the difference did not reach statistical significance.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估用于评估骨状态的不同技术区分绝经后有和无髋部骨折女性的能力。研究了51例发生低能量髋部骨折的绝经后女性(平均年龄64.5±6.5岁)和51例年龄匹配的对照者(平均年龄64.6±6.0岁)。使用能够测量跟骨宽带超声衰减(BUA)和声速(SOSC)的Ubis 3000设备以及能够估计指骨声速(SOSP)的Sunlight Omnisense设备进行定量超声(QUS)评估。使用双能X线吸收法评估股骨颈骨密度(BMD)。QUS变量之间的相关性范围为r = 0.35至0.72,QUS变量与BMD之间的相关性范围为r = 0.30至0.36。BMD是髋部骨折的最佳判别指标(比值比= 3.61,曲线下面积= 0.824)。所有QUS变量都是髋部骨折的显著判别指标,比值比范围为1.88至2.63,ROC曲线下面积范围为0.663至0.740。在QUS变量中,SOSP显示出最佳的比值比和曲线下面积。ROC曲线下面积的比较未显示SOSP、BUA和BMD之间有任何显著差异。相反,SOSC与BMD之间的差异显著(P < 0.05)。总之,本研究中调查的BMD和QUS变量是髋部骨折的显著判别指标。BMD对髋部骨折的区分明显优于跟骨处测量的BUA。此外,BMD对骨折患者的判别优于BUA和SOS(P),尽管差异未达到统计学意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验