Suppr超能文献

空间谐波同步采集技术在膝关节磁共振成像中的应用价值

Usefulness of simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics technique for MRI of the knee.

作者信息

Magee Thomas, Shapiro Marc, Williams David

机构信息

Neuroskeletal Imaging, 255 N Sykes Creek Parkway, Merritt Island, FL 32953, USA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Jun;182(6):1411-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.182.6.1821411.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH) is a parallel-imaging technique that uses fewer echoes than conventional techniques to obtain the desired resolution. Images are produced in a shorter time period using the SMASH technique than conventional techniques. This study assesses the usefulness of the SMASH technique in the MRI evaluation of the knee. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Three experienced musculoskeletal radiologists prospectively interpreted MR images of the knee in 50 consecutive patients. All patients underwent a complete MRI examination of the knee on a 1.5-T MRI scanner. Sagittal proton density fat-saturated and coronal T1-weighted images were obtained. In addition, fat-saturated T2-weighted images were obtained in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes. SMASH T2-weighted imaging in the coronal, axial and sagittal planes took 6 min 38 sec, whereas fast spin-echo conventional T2-weighted imaging took 11 min 45 sec to obtain images in the same planes. Each radiologist interpreted the knee MR examinations prospectively and was unaware whether the images had been obtained using the SMASH T2-weighted or fat-saturated T2-weighted technique. The radiologists provided a report. The three radiologists independently performed a retrospective review of both the fat-saturated T2-weighted and SMASH T2-weighted images. The radiologists were blinded as to which sequence was fat-saturated T2-weighted and which was SMASH T2-weighted. They were asked to reinterpret the images and determine whether either of the T2-weighted sequences altered the original interpretation.

RESULTS

There was no intraobserver variability in MRI interpretations with the use of SMASH imaging as compared with fat-saturated T2-weighted images. Thirty-four patients underwent arthroscopy after imaging. Findings at arthroscopy in those patients were as follows: 28 meniscal tears, 12 anterior cruciate ligament tears, and nine chondral defects. In some patients, multiple abnormalities were detected on MRI. All arthroscopy findings correlated with prospective MRI interpretations.

CONCLUSION

The use of SMASH T2-weighted imaging as opposed to fat-saturated T2-weighted imaging results in a significant decrease in imaging time (> 5-min decrease for each knee examination) without affecting the MRI interpretation or patient clinical outcome.

摘要

目的

同时采集空间谐波(SMASH)是一种并行成像技术,与传统技术相比,它使用更少的回波来获得所需的分辨率。使用SMASH技术比传统技术能在更短的时间内生成图像。本研究评估SMASH技术在膝关节MRI评估中的效用。

对象与方法。三位经验丰富的肌肉骨骼放射科医生对50例连续患者的膝关节MR图像进行前瞻性解读。所有患者均在1.5-T MRI扫描仪上接受了膝关节的完整MRI检查。获得矢状位质子密度脂肪抑制和冠状位T1加权图像。此外,还在冠状位、矢状位和轴位平面上获得了脂肪抑制T2加权图像。冠状位、轴位和矢状位平面的SMASH T2加权成像用时6分38秒,而快速自旋回波传统T2加权成像在相同平面上获得图像用时11分45秒。每位放射科医生对膝关节MR检查进行前瞻性解读,且不知道图像是使用SMASH T2加权技术还是脂肪抑制T2加权技术获得的。放射科医生提供报告。三位放射科医生独立对脂肪抑制T2加权图像和SMASH T2加权图像进行回顾性审查。放射科医生对哪一个序列是脂肪抑制T2加权序列、哪一个是SMASH T2加权序列不知情。他们被要求重新解读图像,并确定两种T2加权序列中的任何一种是否改变了原始解读。

结果

与脂肪抑制T2加权图像相比,使用SMASH成像进行MRI解读时,观察者内部没有变异性。34例患者在成像后接受了关节镜检查。这些患者关节镜检查的结果如下:28例半月板撕裂,12例前交叉韧带撕裂,9例软骨缺损。在一些患者中,MRI检测到多种异常。所有关节镜检查结果均与前瞻性MRI解读相关。

结论

与脂肪抑制T2加权成像相比,使用SMASH T2加权成像可显著减少成像时间(每次膝关节检查减少超过5分钟),且不影响MRI解读或患者临床结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验