Stubbings William J, Bostock Julieanne M, Ingham Eileen, Chopra Ian
Antimicrobial Research Centre and School of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Jul;54(1):139-43. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh275. Epub 2004 May 18.
The post-antibiotic effect (PAE) is an important parameter of antibiotic action that is widely used as a predictor of pharmacodynamic activity. Traditionally, PAE has been determined by a labour-intensive method involving determination of viable cell numbers. New methods using spectrophotometric procedures could offer significant advantages for PAE determinations, particularly in terms of speed. A number of such methods have been described in the literature, but extensive comparison with the classical procedure for determining PAEs has not been carried out. We have now compared PAE values obtained using a rapid microplate method with those achieved by the classical viable count procedure.
We determined PAE values for a variety of antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli following exposure to 5 x MIC drug concentrations for 60 min in Mueller-Hinton Broth (MHB). The duration of the PAE was obtained by following the recovery of bacterial growth in antibiotic-free MHB measured either as colony forming units on Mueller-Hinton agar, or as culture absorbance (600 nm) in a microplate reader.
For bacteriolytic agents there was poor correlation between the two methods for both S. aureus (R2=0.096) and E. coli (R2=0.5456). However, when PAEs for bacteriostatic agents and non-lytic bactericidal agents were compared, correlation between the two methods was high for both S. aureus (R2=0.7529) and E. coli (R2=0.7687).
The spectrophotometric microplate method for determining PAEs may be a suitable alternative to the classical method for those antibiotics that do not induce bacterial cell lysis.
抗生素后效应(PAE)是抗生素作用的一个重要参数,被广泛用作药效学活性的预测指标。传统上,PAE是通过一种劳动密集型方法来测定的,该方法涉及活菌数的测定。使用分光光度法的新方法在PAE测定方面可能具有显著优势,特别是在速度方面。文献中已经描述了许多这样的方法,但尚未与测定PAE的经典方法进行广泛比较。我们现在比较了使用快速微孔板法获得的PAE值与通过经典活菌计数法获得的PAE值。
我们在穆勒-欣顿肉汤(MHB)中,将各种抗生素以5倍最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的药物浓度暴露于金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌60分钟后,测定PAE值。通过跟踪在无抗生素的MHB中细菌生长的恢复情况来获得PAE的持续时间,细菌生长恢复情况通过在穆勒-欣顿琼脂上的菌落形成单位或在微孔板读数器中培养物的吸光度(600nm)来测量。
对于溶菌剂,两种方法在金黄色葡萄球菌(R2 = 0.096)和大肠杆菌(R2 = 0.5456)中相关性都很差。然而,当比较抑菌剂和非溶菌性杀菌剂的PAE时,两种方法在金黄色葡萄球菌(R2 = 0.7529)和大肠杆菌(R2 = 0.7687)中的相关性都很高。
对于那些不诱导细菌细胞裂解的抗生素,分光光度微孔板法测定PAE可能是经典方法的合适替代方法。