Suppr超能文献

成人复杂性尿路感染的治疗:两项随机、双盲、多中心试验的联合分析,比较厄他培南和头孢曲松随后进行适当口服治疗的效果。

Treatment of complicated urinary tract infection in adults: combined analysis of two randomized, double-blind, multicentre trials comparing ertapenem and ceftriaxone followed by appropriate oral therapy.

作者信息

Wells Wilbur G, Woods Gail L, Jiang Qi, Gesser Richard M

机构信息

Alabama Research Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Jun;53 Suppl 2:ii67-74. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh208.

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of parenteral ertapenem, a Group 1 carbapenem, 1 g once a day, for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs; i.e. acute pyelonephritis, UTI in men, or UTI associated with obstruction, foreign body or a urological abnormality interfering with normal voiding) in adults, were compared with those of parenteral ceftriaxone, 1 g once a day, in two similarly designed prospective, double-blind, randomized studies. In both studies, patients could be switched to an oral agent after > or = 3 days of parenteral study therapy. At entry, 850 patients were stratified according to whether they had acute pyelonephritis or other complicated UTI without acute pyelonephritis. Two hundred and fifty-six patients in the ertapenem group and 224 in the ceftriaxone group were microbiologically evaluable. Ninety-six per cent of these patients were switched to oral therapy, usually ciprofloxacin; the median (range) duration of parenteral and total therapy, respectively, was 4 (2-14) days and 13 (14-18) days for ertapenem and 4 (2-14) days and 13 (3-17) days for ceftriaxone. The most common pathogens were Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, which accounted for 64.7% and 9.8% of isolates, respectively. At the primary efficacy endpoint 5-9 days after treatment, 229 (89.5%) patients who received ertapenem and 204 (91.1%) patients who received ceftriaxone had a favourable microbiological response (95% confidence interval, -7.4 to 4.0), indicating that outcomes in the two treatment groups were equivalent. Success rates in both treatment groups were similar when compared by stratum and severity of infection. The frequency and severity of drug-related adverse events were generally similar in both treatment groups. In this combined analysis, ertapenem was highly effective therapy for the treatment of complicated UTIs in adults with moderate-to-severe disease.

摘要

在两项设计相似的前瞻性、双盲、随机研究中,比较了每日1次静脉注射1克碳青霉烯类1组药物厄他培南与每日1次静脉注射1克头孢曲松治疗成人复杂性尿路感染(即急性肾盂肾炎、男性尿路感染或与梗阻、异物或影响正常排尿的泌尿系统异常相关的尿路感染)的疗效和安全性。在两项研究中,接受静脉注射研究治疗≥3天后,患者可改用口服药物。入组时,850例患者根据是否患有急性肾盂肾炎或无急性肾盂肾炎的其他复杂性尿路感染进行分层。厄他培南组256例患者和头孢曲松组224例患者可进行微生物学评估。这些患者中有96%改用口服治疗,通常为环丙沙星;厄他培南组静脉注射和总治疗的中位(范围)持续时间分别为4(2 - 14)天和13(14 - 18)天,头孢曲松组分别为4(2 - 14)天和13(3 - 17)天。最常见的病原体是大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌,分别占分离株的64.7%和9.8%。在治疗后5 - 9天的主要疗效终点,接受厄他培南治疗的229例(89.5%)患者和接受头孢曲松治疗的204例(91.1%)患者有良好的微生物学反应(95%置信区间,-7.4至4.0),表明两个治疗组的结果相当。按感染分层和严重程度比较,两个治疗组的成功率相似。两个治疗组药物相关不良事件的频率和严重程度总体相似。在这项综合分析中,厄他培南是治疗中重度成人复杂性尿路感染的高效疗法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验