Epstein Ronald M, Alper Brian S, Quill Timothy E
Rochester Center to Improve Communication in Health Care, Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14620, USA.
JAMA. 2004 May 19;291(19):2359-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.19.2359.
Informed patients are more likely to actively participate in their care, make wiser decisions, come to a common understanding with their physicians, and adhere more fully to treatment; however, currently there are no evidence-based guidelines for discussing clinical evidence with patients in the process of making medical decisions.
To identify ways to communicate evidence that improve patient understanding, involvement in decisions, and outcomes.
Systematic review of MEDLINE for the period 1966-2003 and review of reference lists of retrieved articles to identify original research dealing with communication between clinicians and patients and directly addressing methods of presenting clinical evidence to patients.
Two investigators and a research assistant screened 367 abstracts and 2 investigators reviewed 51 full-text articles, yielding 8 potentially relevant articles.
Methods for communicating clinical evidence to patients include nonquantitative general terms, numerical translation of clinical evidence, graphical representations, and decision aids. Focus-group data suggest presenting options and/or equipoise before asking patients about preferred decision-making roles or formats for presenting details. Relative risk reductions may be misleading; absolute risk is preferred. Order of information presented and time-frame of outcomes can bias patient understanding. Limited evidence supports use of human stick figure graphics or faces for single probabilities and vertical bar graphs for comparative information. Less-educated and older patients preferred proportions to percentages and did not appreciate confidence intervals. Studies of decision aids rarely addressed patient-physician communication directly. No studies addressed clinical outcomes of discussions of clinical evidence.
There is a paucity of evidence to guide how physicians can most effectively share clinical evidence with patients facing decisions; however, basing our recommendations largely on related studies and expert opinion, we describe means of accomplishing 5 communication tasks to address in framing and communicating clinical evidence: understanding the patient's (and family members') experience and expectations; building partnership; providing evidence, including a balanced discussion of uncertainties; presenting recommendations informed by clinical judgment and patient preferences; and checking for understanding and agreement.
了解情况的患者更有可能积极参与自身护理,做出更明智的决策,与医生达成共识,并更全面地坚持治疗;然而,目前在医疗决策过程中,尚无基于证据的指南指导如何与患者讨论临床证据。
确定能够提高患者理解、参与决策及改善结果的证据沟通方式。
对1966年至2003年期间的MEDLINE进行系统综述,并查阅检索文章的参考文献列表,以确定关于临床医生与患者沟通以及直接探讨向患者呈现临床证据方法的原始研究。
两名研究人员和一名研究助理筛选了367篇摘要,两名研究人员审阅了51篇全文文章,最终得到8篇可能相关的文章。
向患者传达临床证据的方法包括非量化的通用术语、临床证据的数值转换、图形表示以及决策辅助工具。焦点小组数据表明,在询问患者偏好的决策角色或呈现细节的形式之前,先呈现选项和/或平衡状态。相对风险降低可能会产生误导;绝对风险更可取。所呈现信息的顺序和结果的时间框架可能会使患者的理解产生偏差。有限的证据支持使用人体简笔画或面部图形来表示单一概率,使用垂直条形图来呈现比较信息。受教育程度较低和年龄较大的患者更喜欢用比例而非百分比,并且不理解置信区间。决策辅助工具的研究很少直接涉及医患沟通。没有研究涉及临床证据讨论的临床结果。
缺乏证据指导医生如何最有效地与面临决策的患者分享临床证据;然而,在很大程度上基于相关研究和专家意见,我们描述了在构建和传达临床证据时需要完成的5项沟通任务的方法:了解患者(及其家庭成员)的经历和期望;建立伙伴关系;提供证据,包括对不确定性进行平衡讨论;根据临床判断和患者偏好提出建议;检查理解情况并达成一致。