Elander James, Lusher Joanne, Bevan David, Telfer Paul, Burton Bernice
Department of Psychology, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Feb;27(2):156-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.12.001.
Treatment of painful episodes in sickle cell disease (SCD) is sometimes complicated by disputes between patients and staff and patient behaviors that raise concerns about analgesic misuse. Those concern-raising behaviors could indicate either drug seeking caused by analgesic dependence or pseudoaddiction caused by undertreatment of pain. To make a systematic assessment of concern-raising behaviors and examine their associations with other factors, including DSM-IV symptoms of substance dependence, individual, in-depth interviews with SCD patients were conducted to apply pre-established criteria for concern-raising behaviors. These included disputes with staff tampering with analgesic delivery systems, passing prescribed analgesics from one person to another, being suspected or accused of analgesic misuse, self-discharging from hospital, obtaining analgesic prescriptions from multiple sources, using illicit drugs, and injecting analgesics. Assessments were also made of pain-related symptoms of substance dependence (where behaviors resemble substance dependence but reflect attempts to manage pain, increasing the risk of pseudoaddiction), non-pain-related symptoms of substance dependence (where substance dependence reflects analgesic use beyond pain management), and pain coping strategies (using the Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire). Inter-rater reliability for the assessment of concern-raising behaviors was high, with Kappa coefficients of 0.63 to 1.0. The most frequent concern-raising behaviors were disputes with staff about pain or analgesics. The least frequent were tampering with analgesic delivery systems and passing analgesics between patients in hospital. The odds of concern-raising behaviors in hospital were raised eightfold by less use of ignoring pain as a coping strategy, and more than doubled by each additional pain-related symptom of substance dependence. Non-pain-related symptoms of substance dependence had no independent effect on concern-raising behaviors. Concern-raising behaviors were more closely associated with pain behaviors that make patients vulnerable to misperceptions of substance dependence than they were with genuine substance dependence. The results show how pseudoaddiction can adversely influence hospital pain management, and suggest that more emphasis should be placed on patients' pain and analgesic needs when responding to concern-raising behaviors in hospital.
镰状细胞病(SCD)疼痛发作的治疗有时会因患者与医护人员之间的纠纷以及引发镇痛药物滥用担忧的患者行为而变得复杂。这些引发担忧的行为可能表明是由镇痛药物依赖导致的药物寻求行为,或者是由疼痛治疗不足引起的假性成瘾。为了对引发担忧的行为进行系统评估,并研究它们与其他因素(包括物质依赖的DSM-IV症状)之间的关联,对SCD患者进行了个体深入访谈,以应用预先确定的引发担忧行为的标准。这些标准包括与篡改镇痛药物输送系统的医护人员发生纠纷、将处方镇痛药从一人转给另一人、被怀疑或指控滥用镇痛药、自行出院、从多个来源获取镇痛药处方、使用非法药物以及注射镇痛药。还对物质依赖的疼痛相关症状(行为类似于物质依赖,但反映了管理疼痛的尝试,增加了假性成瘾的风险)、物质依赖的非疼痛相关症状(物质依赖反映了超出疼痛管理范围的镇痛药使用)以及疼痛应对策略(使用疼痛应对策略问卷)进行了评估。评估引发担忧行为的评分者间信度很高,Kappa系数为0.63至1.0。最常见的引发担忧行为是与医护人员就疼痛或镇痛药发生纠纷。最不常见的是篡改镇痛药物输送系统以及在医院患者之间传递镇痛药。较少将忽视疼痛作为应对策略会使在医院出现引发担忧行为的几率增加八倍,每增加一项物质依赖的疼痛相关症状,几率就会增加一倍多。物质依赖的非疼痛相关症状对引发担忧行为没有独立影响。引发担忧行为与使患者容易被误解为物质依赖的疼痛行为的关联比与真正的物质依赖更为密切。结果表明假性成瘾如何对医院疼痛管理产生不利影响,并建议在应对医院中引发担忧的行为时,应更加重视患者的疼痛和镇痛需求。