Spellman Paul T, Sherlock Gavin
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Life Science Division, 1 Cyclotron Road, Building 84, Room 336, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Trends Biotechnol. 2004 Jun;22(6):270-3. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.04.010.
Studies of gene expression during the eukaryotic cell cycle in whole-culture synchronized cultures have been published using many methodologies. These procedures alter the state of the cell cycle for a population of cells, rather than purifying a population of cells that are in the same state. Criticism of these methods (e.g. see Cooper, this issue, pp. 266-269, ) suggests that these studies are flawed, and posits that such methodologies cannot be used to study the cell cycle because they alter the size and age distributions of the cultures. We believe that whole-culture cell cycle studies work even though they alter the size and age distributions: these cells still progress through the cell cycle and although we do not suggest that the methods are perfect, we will explain how these microarray studies have successfully identified cell cycle regulated genes and why these results are biologically meaningful.
运用多种方法,针对全培养同步培养物中真核细胞周期的基因表达研究已发表。这些程序改变了一群细胞的细胞周期状态,而非纯化处于相同状态的一群细胞。对这些方法的批评(例如见库珀本期第266 - 269页)表明这些研究存在缺陷,并认为此类方法不能用于研究细胞周期,因为它们改变了培养物的大小和年龄分布。我们认为全培养细胞周期研究尽管改变了大小和年龄分布,但仍可行:这些细胞仍会经历细胞周期,并且尽管我们并不认为这些方法完美,但我们将解释这些微阵列研究如何成功鉴定出细胞周期调控基因以及为何这些结果具有生物学意义。