Turner Paul E
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.
Genetics. 2004 May;167(1):9-20. doi: 10.1534/genetics.167.1.9.
Plasmid pB15 was previously shown to evolve increased horizontal (infectious) transfer at the expense of reduced vertical (intergenerational) transfer and vice versa, a key trade-off assumed in theories of parasite virulence. Whereas the models predict that susceptible host abundance should determine which mode of transfer is selectively favored, host density failed to mediate the trade-off in pB15. One possibility is that the plasmid's transfer deviates from the assumption that horizontal spread (conjugation) occurs in direct proportion to cell density. I tested this hypothesis using Escherichia coli/pB15 associations in laboratory serial culture. Contrary to most models of plasmid transfer kinetics, my data show that pB15 invades static (nonshaking) bacterial cultures only at intermediate densities. The results can be explained by phenotypic plasticity in traits governing plasmid transfer. As cells become more numerous, the plasmid's conjugative transfer unexpectedly declines, while the trade-off between transmission routes causes vertical transfer to increase. Thus, at intermediate densities the plasmid's horizontal transfer can offset selection against plasmid-bearing cells, but at high densities pB15 conjugates so poorly that it cannot invade. I discuss adaptive vs. nonadaptive causes for the phenotypic plasticity, as well as potential mechanisms that may lead to complex transfer dynamics of plasmids in liquid environments.
质粒pB15先前已被证明会以降低垂直(代际)传递为代价来进化出增强的水平(感染性)传递,反之亦然,这是寄生虫毒力理论中假设的一个关键权衡。虽然模型预测易感宿主的丰度应决定哪种传递模式被选择性地青睐,但宿主密度未能调节pB15中的这种权衡。一种可能性是,质粒的传递偏离了水平传播(接合)与细胞密度成正比发生的假设。我在实验室连续培养中使用大肠杆菌/pB15组合测试了这一假设。与大多数质粒传递动力学模型相反,我的数据表明pB15仅在中等密度时侵入静态(不摇晃)细菌培养物。这些结果可以通过控制质粒传递的性状中的表型可塑性来解释。随着细胞数量增多,质粒的接合传递意外下降,而传递途径之间的权衡导致垂直传递增加。因此,在中等密度时,质粒的水平传递可以抵消对携带质粒细胞的选择,但在高密度时,pB15的接合效果很差,以至于它无法侵入。我讨论了表型可塑性的适应性与非适应性原因,以及可能导致质粒在液体环境中出现复杂传递动态的潜在机制。