Bianchini Kevin J, Greve Kevin W, Love Jeffrey M
Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 Nov;17(4):574-80. doi: 10.1076/clin.17.4.574.27946.
There has been disagreement in the literature about whether persons with documented neuropathology can be diagnosed as malingering. To address this question, we present three moderate severe traumatic brain injury patients who were evaluated in the context of litigation who met the Slick, Sherman, and Iverson (1999) criteria for a diagnosis of "Definite Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction." Each performed significantly below-chance on at least one forced-choice symptom validity test, thereby demonstrating a deliberate attempt to appear impaired. These cases represent the first definitive evidence of an intentional effort to appear impaired in the context of documented moderate/severe traumatic brain injury.
关于有神经病理学记录的人是否可被诊断为诈病,文献中存在分歧。为解决这个问题,我们介绍了三名中度至重度创伤性脑损伤患者,他们在诉讼背景下接受了评估,符合斯利克、谢尔曼和艾弗森(1999年)“明确诈病性神经认知功能障碍”的诊断标准。每个人在至少一项强制选择症状效度测试中的表现均显著低于随机水平,从而表明其故意装出受损的样子。这些病例代表了在有记录的中度/重度创伤性脑损伤背景下故意装出受损的首个确凿证据。