Greve Kevin W, Bianchini Kevin J, Doane Bridget M
Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans-Lakefront, LA 70148,USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct;28(7):1176-90. doi: 10.1080/13803390500263550.
This study used a known-groups design to determine the classification accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering (Tombaugh, 1996, 1997) in detecting cognitive malingering in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Forty-one of 161 TBI patients met Slick, Sherman, and Iverson (1999) criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction. Twenty-two no-incentive memory disorder patients were also included. The original cutoffs (<45) for Trial 2 and Retention demonstrated excellent specificity (less than a 5% false positive error rate) and impressive sensitivity (greater than 45%). However, these cutoffs are actually conservative in the context of mild TBI. Over 90% of the non-MND mild TBI sample scored 48 or higher on the Retention Trial and none scored less than 46 while 60% of the MND patients claiming mild TBI were detected at those levels. Trial 1 also demonstrated excellent classification accuracy. Application of these data to clinical practice is discussed.
本研究采用已知群体设计,以确定记忆伪装测验(Tombaugh,1996年、1997年)在检测创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中的认知伪装方面的分类准确性。161名TBI患者中有41名符合Slick、Sherman和Iverson(1999年)关于伪装性神经认知功能障碍的标准。还纳入了22名无诱因记忆障碍患者。试验2和记忆保持的原始临界值(<45)显示出极佳的特异性(假阳性错误率低于5%)和令人印象深刻的敏感性(大于45%)。然而,在轻度TBI的背景下,这些临界值实际上较为保守。超过90%的非伪装性神经认知功能障碍轻度TBI样本在记忆保持试验中的得分达到48或更高,且无人得分低于46,而在这些水平上,60%声称患有轻度TBI的伪装性神经认知功能障碍患者被检测出来。试验1也显示出极佳的分类准确性。本文讨论了将这些数据应用于临床实践的情况。