Suppr超能文献

阵发性和持续性心房颤动内心房除颤阈值的可重复性

Reproducibility of internal atrial defibrillation threshold in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Villani Giovanni Quinto, Piepoli Massimo Francesco, Capucci Alessandro

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto General Hospital, 49, Via Taverna, Piacenza I-29100, Italy.

出版信息

Europace. 2004 Jul;6(4):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.03.006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several pharmacological or technical factors may affect atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) for internal cardioversion (ICV) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

We evaluated the reproducibility of ADFT in lone paroxysmal (electrically induced AF, 10 pts, 51+/-4 years) or persistent AF (15 pts, 64+/-7 years). The AF pattern (F-F interval) was characterised before each ICV attempt. A first step-up synchronised ICV test (ICV1, biphasic shock waveform 6 ms/6 ms) with increasing energy levels from 0.2 to 20 J was performed by a dual-lead defibrillation system (right atrium-coronary sinus configuration) connected to an external cardioverter defibrillator. After 30 min of stable sinus rhythm, a new sustained AF was induced (>20 min duration) and ICV protocol was repeated (ICV2). The AF cycle length was recorded for 30 s from the lateral wall of right atrium in basal condition and before each cardioversion attempt.

RESULTS

The mean values of AF cycle length before a successful shock were similar in both AF populations (paroxysmal AF: pre-ICV1 175+/-21 ms vs pre-ICV2 181+/-20 ms (p=NS); persistent AF pre-ICV1 194+/-25 ms vs pre-ICV2 202+/-15 ms (p=NS)). No significant differences were observed between the two successful ICV tests concerning intensity, energy and impedance levels. The value of ADFT energy was reproducible in paroxysmal AF population (SD differences 1.2, coefficient of variability 9.6%). In persistent AF group only the impedance was reproducible (SD differences 2.6 Omega, coefficient of variability 4.5%), but not the energy requirements (SD differences 9.6, coefficient of variability 44.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

ADFT is reproducible in paroxysmal AF patients, while a high coefficient of variability is present in persistent AF, possibly related to different patterns of re-entrant circuits in the reinduced AF. This observation is important in order to evaluate factors influencing ICV-ADFT correctly in AF patients.

摘要

背景

在心房颤动(AF)治疗中,多种药理学或技术因素可能影响体内心脏复律(ICV)的心房除颤阈值(ADFT)。

方法

我们评估了孤立性阵发性房颤(电诱发房颤,10例患者,51±4岁)或持续性房颤(15例患者,64±7岁)中ADFT的可重复性。在每次ICV尝试前对房颤模式(F-F间期)进行特征描述。通过连接到体外心脏复律除颤器的双极除颤系统(右心房-冠状窦配置)进行第一步同步ICV测试(ICV1,双相电击波形6 ms/6 ms),能量水平从0.2 J增加到20 J。在窦性心律稳定30分钟后,诱导新的持续性房颤(持续时间>20分钟)并重复ICV方案(ICV2)。在基础状态下以及每次心脏复律尝试前,从右心房侧壁记录房颤周期长度30秒。

结果

在两个房颤群体中,成功电击前房颤周期长度的平均值相似(阵发性房颤:ICV1前175±21 ms vs ICV2前181±20 ms(p=无显著性差异);持续性房颤ICV1前194±25 ms vs ICV2前202±15 ms(p=无显著性差异))。在两次成功的ICV测试之间,关于强度、能量和阻抗水平未观察到显著差异。ADFT能量值在阵发性房颤群体中具有可重复性(标准差差异1.2,变异系数9.6%)。在持续性房颤组中,只有阻抗具有可重复性(标准差差异2.6欧姆,变异系数4.5%),但能量需求不具有可重复性(标准差差异9.6,变异系数44.3%)。

结论

ADFT在阵发性房颤患者中具有可重复性,而在持续性房颤中变异系数较高,这可能与再诱发房颤中折返环路的不同模式有关。这一观察结果对于正确评估影响房颤患者ICV-ADFT的因素很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验