Molina Arturo Martín Peñato, Cosío Francisco G, Pastor Agustín, Núñez Ambrosio, Awamleh Paula
Servicio de Cardiología, Complejo Hospitalario Torrecardenas, Almería, Spain.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Jan;31(1):88-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00930.x.
Electrical defibrillation is very effective in interrupting atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its mechanism is not completely understood. We report our observations in patients subjected to external electriocardioversion (ECV) of atrial fibrillation and contrast them with recent theories about defibrillation mechanism.
In 13 consecutive patients transthoracic electrical cardioversion for AF was performed during an electrophysiological study (11 monophasic -200-360 J- and 9 biphasic shocks -50-150 J-). About 10-16 electrograms were obtained with multipolar catheters recording right atrium, coronary sinus, and right pulmonary artery. AF was defined by interelectrogram intervals and changing sequences among recordings, indicating complete lack of organization. We evaluated the presence of propagated activations immediately (<300 ms) after successful shocks (>or=1 discrete electrogram in all recordings). In unsuccessful shocks we evaluated changes in electrogram morphology (discrete/fragmented) and interelectrogram intervals before and after defibrillation.
About 16/20 shocks terminated AF. In 6/16 one or two cycles of atrial activation were recorded just after the shock and before AF ended. In 10/16 AF was interrupted immediately after the shock. 4/20 shocks did not interrupt the arrhythmia. After these shocks, transient organization of recorded activity with longer interelectrogram cycle length and disappearance of fragmented activity were transiently observed.
Our clinical findings in atrial defibrillation in vivo reproduce experimental data that show myocardial activations early after successful direct current shocks. These observations suggest that successful defibrillation depends not only on the immediate effects of the shock, but also on transient effects on electrophysiological properties of the myocardium, capable of interrupting persistent or reinitiated activations.
电除颤在终止心房颤动(AF)方面非常有效。然而,其机制尚未完全明确。我们报告了对接受心房颤动体外电复律(ECV)患者的观察结果,并将其与关于除颤机制的最新理论进行对比。
在一项电生理研究中,对13例连续患者进行了经胸房颤电复律(11次单相电击 -200 - 360焦耳 - 以及9次双相电击 -50 - 150焦耳)。使用多极导管记录右心房、冠状窦和右肺动脉,获取约10 - 16个电图。通过电图间期和记录之间变化的序列来定义房颤,表明完全缺乏组织性。我们评估了成功电击后立即(<300毫秒)是否存在传播性激动(所有记录中≥1个离散电图)。对于未成功的电击,我们评估了除颤前后电图形态(离散/破碎)和电图间期的变化。
约16/20次电击终止了房颤。在16次中有6次,在电击后且房颤结束前记录到了一或两个心房激动周期。在16次中有10次,房颤在电击后立即被中断。4/20次电击未中断心律失常。在这些电击后,短暂观察到记录活动的短暂组织化,电图周期长度延长且破碎活动消失。
我们在体内心房除颤的临床发现重现了实验数据,即成功直流电电击后早期出现心肌激动。这些观察结果表明,成功除颤不仅取决于电击的即时效应,还取决于对心肌电生理特性的短暂效应,这种效应能够中断持续或重新启动的激动。