Suppr超能文献

内镜检查期间的中度镇静:一项使用低剂量丙泊酚、哌替啶/芬太尼和咪达唑仑的前瞻性研究。

Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: a prospective study using low-dose propofol, meperidine/fentanyl, and midazolam.

作者信息

Cohen Lawrence B, Hightower Charles D, Wood Daniel A, Miller Kenneth M, Aisenberg James

机构信息

Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jun;59(7):795-803. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00349-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Propofol provides several benefits over benzodiazepine and narcotic agents as a sedative medication for endoscopic procedures, including faster recovery and improved patient satisfaction. However, its use generally has been limited to anesthesiologists because of the risks associated with deep sedation.

METHODS

One hundred patients undergoing colonoscopy or EGD were sedated with low-dose propofol, midazolam, and fentanyl (or meperidine). Depth of sedation was assessed at 2-minute intervals by an independent observer by using the American Society of Anesthesiologists criteria. Recovery time was determined by using paired neuropsychometric tests. A post-procedure satisfaction survey and 24-hour follow-up questionnaires were administered.

RESULTS

For colonoscopy and EGD, respectively, the mean propofol dose was 98 mg and 79 mg, the mean midazolam dose was 0.9 mg and 0.8 mg, the mean fentanyl dose was 69 mcg and 63 mcg, and the mean meperidine dose was 42 mg (for both procedures). There were 628 assessments of the level of sedation performed during 74 colonoscopies and 101 assessments during 26 EGDs. The level of sedation was minimal in 77%, moderate in 21%, and deep in 2% of assessments. Nine of the 13 episodes of deep sedation were recorded during colonoscopy and 4 during EGD. In no instance was more than a single assessment of deep sedation recorded during one procedure. Ninety-eight percent of patients were satisfied with the sedation, and 71% returned to their usual activities within 2 hours of discharge. There was no serious adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic sedation with low-dose propofol, a narcotic agent, and midazolam produces a moderate level of sedation. The quality of sedation and measures of recovery are comparable with the results reported with standard-dose propofol.

摘要

背景

作为内镜检查的镇静药物,丙泊酚相较于苯二氮䓬类和麻醉性镇痛药具有多种优势,包括恢复更快和患者满意度提高。然而,由于深度镇静相关风险,其使用通常局限于麻醉医生。

方法

100例行结肠镜检查或上消化道内镜检查的患者接受低剂量丙泊酚、咪达唑仑和芬太尼(或哌替啶)镇静。由一名独立观察者每隔2分钟使用美国麻醉医师协会标准评估镇静深度。通过配对神经心理测试确定恢复时间。进行了术后满意度调查和24小时随访问卷调查。

结果

对于结肠镜检查和上消化道内镜检查,丙泊酚平均剂量分别为98mg和79mg,咪达唑仑平均剂量分别为0.9mg和0.8mg,芬太尼平均剂量分别为69μg和63μg,哌替啶平均剂量均为42mg。在74例结肠镜检查中进行了628次镇静水平评估,在26例上消化道内镜检查中进行了101次评估。77%的评估中镇静水平为轻度,21%为中度,2%为深度。13例深度镇静中有9例记录于结肠镜检查期间,4例记录于上消化道内镜检查期间。在任何一次检查中,深度镇静记录均未超过单次评估。98%的患者对镇静满意,71%的患者在出院后2小时内恢复日常活动。未发生严重不良事件。

结论

低剂量丙泊酚、一种麻醉性镇痛药和咪达唑仑用于内镜镇静可产生中度镇静水平。镇静质量和恢复指标与标准剂量丙泊酚报告的结果相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验