Suppr超能文献

急性胆囊炎选择性经皮经肝胆囊引流术后腹腔镜胆囊切除术的评估

An evaluation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after selective percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis.

作者信息

Tsumura Hiroaki, Ichikawa Toru, Hiyama Eiso, Kagawa Tetsuya, Nishihara Masahiro, Murakami Yoshiaki, Sueda Taijiro

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hiroshima Municipal Funairi Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jun;59(7):839-44. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00456-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and usefulness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after selective percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in patients with severe acute cholecystitis and patients with acute cholecystitis and severe comorbid disease.

METHODS

According to whether percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage was performed before surgery, 133 patients with acute cholecystitis were divided into a percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage group (n=60) and non-percutaneous-transhepatic-gallbladder-drainage group (n=73). Background factors, safety, and postoperative course were retrospectively evaluated and compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the non-percutaneous-transhepatic-gallbladder-drainage group, the percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage group was significantly older (p=0.0009), had a higher frequency of comorbid disease (p=0.0252), and a worse American Society of Anesthesiology classification (p=0.0021). In individual statistical tests, body temperature (p=0.0288), white blood cell count (p=0.0175), and C-reactive protein value (p=0.0022) were significantly elevated in the percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage group; however, for frequency of comorbid disease, body temperature, and white blood cell count, significance was removed by correction for multiple testing of data. There was no significant difference in gender distribution, history of upper abdominal surgery, or body mass index between the two groups. The duration of surgery was marginally but significantly longer in the percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage group (p=0.0414; in a single statistical test; however, that significance was removed by correction for the multiple testing of data). Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in blood loss at surgery, frequency of postoperative complications, rate of conversion to open laparotomy, interval until oral feeding was resumed, and length of postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that satisfactory outcomes can be achieved with selective pre-operative gallbladder drainage in older and sicker patients with acute cholecystitis.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估在重症急性胆囊炎患者以及患有急性胆囊炎且伴有严重合并症的患者中,选择性经皮经肝胆囊引流术后行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性和有效性。

方法

根据术前是否进行经皮经肝胆囊引流,将133例急性胆囊炎患者分为经皮经肝胆囊引流组(n = 60)和非经皮经肝胆囊引流组(n = 73)。对两组患者的背景因素、安全性及术后病程进行回顾性评估和比较。

结果

与非经皮经肝胆囊引流组相比,经皮经肝胆囊引流组患者年龄显著更大(p = 0.0009),合并症发生率更高(p = 0.0252),美国麻醉医师协会分级更差(p = 0.0021)。在单项统计检验中,经皮经肝胆囊引流组患者体温(p = 0.0288)、白细胞计数(p = 0.0175)和C反应蛋白值(p = 0.0022)显著升高;然而,对于合并症发生率、体温和白细胞计数,经数据多重检验校正后显著性消失。两组间性别分布、上腹部手术史或体重指数无显著差异。经皮经肝胆囊引流组手术时间略长但有显著差异(p = 0.0414;单项统计检验);然而,经数据多重检验校正后该显著性消失。两组间手术出血量、术后并发症发生率、转为开腹手术的比例、恢复经口进食的间隔时间及术后住院时间无显著差异。

结论

这些数据表明,对于年龄较大且病情较重的急性胆囊炎患者,术前选择性胆囊引流可取得满意疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验