• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Efficacy of Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage on Acute Cholecystitis in High-Risk Elderly Patients Based on the Tokyo Guidelines: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.基于东京指南的经皮经肝胆管引流术对高危老年急性胆囊炎患者的疗效:一项回顾性病例对照研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(34):e1442. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001442.
2
Efficacy and safety of B-mode ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly and high-risk patients.B超引导下经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗老年高危急性胆囊炎的疗效及安全性
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 9;15:81. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0294-2.
3
Efficacy of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in treating acute calculous cholecystitis in elderly patients.早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经皮经肝胆囊引流术治疗老年急性结石性胆囊炎的疗效比较。
Acta Chir Belg. 2024 Jun;124(3):178-186. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2023.2232672. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
4
Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage Combined with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Complicated Cholecystitis: Comparison of Curative Efficacy.经皮经肝胆管引流联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术与急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性复杂性胆囊炎的疗效比较
Am Surg. 2018 Mar 1;84(3):438-442.
5
Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage Combined with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经皮经肝胆道引流联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术:随机对照试验的Meta分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Mar;28(3):248-255. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0514. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
6
The choice of operation timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective clinical analysis.经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术(PTGBD)后行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)治疗急性胆囊炎的手术时机选择:回顾性临床分析。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Aug;10(8):9096-9104. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1906.
7
Comparison of Emergency Cholecystectomy with Delayed Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage in Patients with Moderate Acute Cholecystitis.中度急性胆囊炎患者经皮经肝胆管胆囊引流术后急诊胆囊切除术与延期胆囊切除术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jun;28(6):705-712. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0502. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
8
Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage followed by elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with moderate to severe acute cholecystitis.对于中重度急性胆囊炎患者,先行经皮经肝胆管胆囊引流术,然后择期行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(44):e8533. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008533.
9
Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage Combined with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for the Treatment of Moderate Acute Cholecystitis: A Meta-Analysis.经皮经肝胆囊引流术联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术与急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗中度急性胆囊炎的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Jul;32(7):733-739. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0579. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
10
Impact of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for patients with complicated acute cholecystitis.经皮经肝胆管引流术后延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术对复杂性急性胆囊炎患者的影响。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Feb;19(1):20-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318188e2fe.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic cholecystic puncture and drainage for acute severe cholecystitis-a Case Report.超声引导下经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流治疗急性重症胆囊炎——病例报告
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 3;12:1585967. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1585967. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating effectiveness and safety of combined percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis patients: Meta-analysis.评估经皮经肝胆道引流联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术在急性胆囊炎患者中的有效性和安全性:Meta分析
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 May 27;16(5):1407-1419. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1407.
3
Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 who developed gangrenous cholecystitis: a case report.2019冠状病毒病患者发生坏疽性胆囊炎后行延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一例报告
Surg Case Rep. 2022 Jul 18;8(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s40792-022-01494-7.
4
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage Versus Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Meta-Analysis.经皮经肝胆囊引流术后延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术与急性胆囊炎行急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov;32(11):945-955. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2021.20578.
5
WSES/GAIS/SIS-E/WSIS/AAST global clinical pathways for patients with intra-abdominal infections.WSES/GAIS/SIS-E/WSIS/AAST 全球腹腔内感染患者临床路径。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Sep 25;16(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00387-8.
6
Surgical outcome of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: Ten years' experience at a tertiary care centre.经皮经肝胆囊引流术治疗急性胆囊炎的手术效果:一家三级保健中心的十年经验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):2850-2860. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08573-0. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
7
Percutaneous cholecystostomy… why, when, what next? A systematic review of past decade.经皮胆囊造瘘术……为何、何时、接下来如何?对过去十年的系统评价。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Oct 5;100(8):1-14. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0150.
8
The management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections.从全球视角看腹腔内感染的管理:2017 年 WSES 腹腔内感染管理指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Jul 10;12:29. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0141-6. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Intra-biliary contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluating biliary obstruction during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: a preliminary study.经皮经肝胆道引流术中胆道内对比增强超声评估胆道梗阻:初步研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec;81(12):3846-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.06.025. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
2
Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage changes emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy to an elective operation in patients with acute cholecystitis.经皮经肝胆管引流术可将急性胆囊炎患者的急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术转变为择期手术。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Dec;21(10):941-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0217.
3
Can percutaneous cholecystostomy be a definitive management for acute acalculous cholecystitis?经皮胆囊造口术可否作为急性非结石性胆囊炎的确定性治疗方法?
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;46(3):216-9. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182274375.
4
Percutaneous drainage versus emergency cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: does it matter?经皮胆囊引流与急诊胆囊切除术治疗重症急性胆囊炎:有区别吗?
World J Surg. 2011 Apr;35(4):826-33. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-0985-y.
5
Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis.重症急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术结果
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 May;12(5):829-35. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0504-0. Epub 2008 Mar 8.
6
Results of the Tokyo Consensus Meeting Tokyo Guidelines.东京共识会议东京指南的结果。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(1):114-21. doi: 10.1007/s00534-006-1163-8. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
7
Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database.腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者围手术期并发症的危险因素:对瑞士腹腔镜与胸腔镜外科学会数据库中22953例连续病例的分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.018. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
8
Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective non randomized study.急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的时机:一项前瞻性非随机研究
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep 14;12(34):5528-31. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i34.5528.
9
An evaluation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after selective percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎选择性经皮经肝胆囊引流术后腹腔镜胆囊切除术的评估
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jun;59(7):839-44. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00456-0.
10
Timing of urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not influence conversion rate.急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的时机不影响中转率。
Br J Surg. 2004 May;91(5):601-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4539.

基于东京指南的经皮经肝胆管引流术对高危老年急性胆囊炎患者的疗效:一项回顾性病例对照研究

The Efficacy of Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage on Acute Cholecystitis in High-Risk Elderly Patients Based on the Tokyo Guidelines: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

作者信息

Ni Qingqiang, Chen Dongbo, Xu Rui, Shang Dong

机构信息

From the Medical college of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu (QN); Department of General Surgery, Pancreato-Biliary Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning (QN, DC, DS); Department of General Surgery, Fujian Provincial Longyan First Hospital (DC) and Department of Cardiology, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China (RX).

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(34):e1442. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001442.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000001442
PMID:26313804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4602922/
Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGD) for high-risk elderly patients with acute cholecystitis.Retrospective analysis of 159 acute cholecystitis patients who were admitted to General Surgery Division III of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University between January 2005 and November 2012. A total of 123 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), and 36 received only PTGD treatment. The LC patients were divided into 3 groups based on their preoperative treatment: group A, emergency patients (33 patients); group B (26 patients), patients who were treated with PTGD prior to LC; and group C (64 patients), patients who received nonsurgical treatment prior to LC. General conditions, LC surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, rate of conversion to open surgery, incidence of postoperative complications, total fasting time, and total hospitalization time were analyzed and compared among the 3 groups.The remission rates of patients in the PTGD treatment groups (including group B and PTGD treatment only group) were significantly higher within 24 and 48 hours than those of patients who received nonsurgical treatment prior to LC (P < 0.05). Among the patients in the 3 surgery groups, the operation conversion rate (19.2%) of group B was significantly higher than that of group A (3.0%) and group C (1.6%) (P < 0.05). The total hospitalization time of the patients in group B (18.5 ± 4.5 days) was longer than that of the patients in group A (8.2 ± 3.9 days) and group C (10.5 ± 6.4 days). The total fasting time of the patients in group A (2.4 ± 1.2 days) was significantly shorter than that of those in group B (4.1 ± 1.7 days) and group C (3.4 ± 2.7 days) (P < 0.05).For high-risk elderly patients, if there is any emergency surgery contraindication, PTGD therapy may be safe and effective and can relieve the symptoms within a short time. For acute cholecystitis patients without surgery contraindications, emergency surgery should be performed as soon as possible after diagnosis.

摘要

评估经皮经肝胆管引流术(PTGD)对高危老年急性胆囊炎患者的疗效。回顾性分析2005年1月至2012年11月大连医科大学附属第一医院普通外科三病房收治的159例急性胆囊炎患者。其中123例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC),36例仅接受PTGD治疗。将LC患者根据术前治疗情况分为3组:A组,急诊患者(33例);B组(26例),LC术前接受PTGD治疗的患者;C组(64例),LC术前接受非手术治疗的患者。分析比较3组患者的一般情况、LC手术时长、术中出血量、中转开腹手术率、术后并发症发生率、总禁食时间和总住院时间。PTGD治疗组(包括B组和单纯PTGD治疗组)患者在24小时和48小时内的缓解率显著高于LC术前接受非手术治疗的患者(P<0.05)。3个手术组患者中,B组的手术中转率(19.2%)显著高于A组(3.0%)和C组(1.6%)(P<0.05)。B组患者的总住院时间(18.5±4.5天)长于A组(8.2±3.9天)和C组(10.5±6.4天)。A组患者的总禁食时间(2.4±1.2天)显著短于B组(4.1±1.7天)和C组(3.4±2.7天)(P<0.05)。对于高危老年患者,若存在急诊手术禁忌证,PTGD治疗可能安全有效且能在短时间内缓解症状。对于无手术禁忌证的急性胆囊炎患者,确诊后应尽快行急诊手术。