Ooms Tara G, Way Holly L, Bley John A
University of Illinois-Chicago, Biologic Resources Laboratory, 1840 W. Taylor Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2004 May;43(3):38-42.
We conducted a study designed to mimic a typical pharmacokinetic study to gain a better understanding of a dog's response to multiple, frequent blood sampling at 15% total blood volume. Ten dogs were randomly assigned to either a control group having sham venipuncture performed or to a blood collection group having 1.5% of their body weight (approximately 15% total blood volume) removed weekly for 4 weeks. Both groups were monitored during a 2-week recovery period immediately after the 4-week collection period. Parameters evaluated were clinical signs, body weight, and hematological and serum biochemical analytes. There were minimal differences in red blood cell morphology between the two groups. Statistically significant differences in hematocrit between the two groups occurred on several days, and this finding was attributed to blood withdrawal in the blood collection group; however, this statistical difference was not deemed to be clinically significant. There were no statistically significant differences in body weight, total protein, reticulocyte count, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, or red cell distribution width. We conclude that removing 15% blood volume in laboratory beagles is compatible with maintaining the health and well-being of the dog and can be acceptable in laboratory situations when it is scientifically justified.
我们开展了一项研究,旨在模拟典型的药代动力学研究,以便更好地了解犬只对以总血量的15%进行多次频繁采血的反应。十只犬被随机分为两组,一组为接受假静脉穿刺的对照组,另一组为每周采血其体重的1.5%(约占总血量的15%),持续四周的采血组。在四周采血期结束后的两周恢复期内,对两组犬均进行监测。评估的参数包括临床症状、体重、血液学和血清生化分析物。两组之间红细胞形态的差异极小。两组之间在多个时间点的血细胞比容存在统计学上的显著差异,这一发现归因于采血组的血液抽取;然而,这种统计学差异被认为无临床意义。在体重、总蛋白、网织红细胞计数、平均红细胞体积、平均红细胞血红蛋白或红细胞分布宽度方面,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。我们得出结论,在实验用小猎犬中抽取15%的血量与维持犬只的健康和福祉是相容的,并且在科学合理的实验室情况下是可以接受的。