Conduit Russell, Crewther Sheila Gillard, Coleman Grahame
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Caufield, Victoria, Australia.
J Sleep Res. 2004 Jun;13(2):137-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2004.00397.x.
The present study aimed to test whether spontaneous eyelid movements (ELMs) during stage 2 and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep are related to more frequent and vivid reports of visual mentation on awakening. Participants were awakened 15 s after an ELM was observed during ongoing REM and stage 2 sleep and immediately asked for a mentation report and to rate the visual vividness of any imagery they could remember. These reports were compared with control reports collected after a period of ELM quiescence before awakening (noELM). Significantly greater frequencies of imagery reports were collected after ELM awakenings compared with noELM awakenings from stage 2, but not REM sleep. When imagery was reported, imagery ratings were not significantly different between ELM and noELM conditions, regardless of sleep stage. The average amount of electroencephalogram (EEG) arousal 15 s after stage 2 awakenings was significantly higher in the ELM compared with noELM conditions. In addition, within the stage 2 ELM condition, EEG arousal was significantly higher when visual imagery was reported compared with reports without imagery; suggesting that the observed increase in imagery reporting from the stage 2 ELM condition could have been mediated by the level of brain arousal. Such arousal possibly provides better conditions to attend and recall previous mental activity from NREM sleep. However, there was no ELM/arousal effect within REM sleep, possibly because this state is already at maximum sleeping levels of arousal, attention and resulting dream recall.
本研究旨在测试在快速眼动(REM)睡眠和第二阶段睡眠期间,自发眼睑运动(ELM)是否与醒来时更频繁、更生动的视觉思维报告有关。在正在进行的REM睡眠和第二阶段睡眠期间观察到ELM后15秒,唤醒参与者,并立即要求他们进行思维报告,并对他们能记住的任何意象的视觉生动程度进行评分。将这些报告与唤醒前一段ELM静止期(无ELM)后收集的对照报告进行比较。与第二阶段睡眠的无ELM唤醒相比,ELM唤醒后收集到的意象报告频率显著更高,但REM睡眠中并非如此。当报告意象时,无论睡眠阶段如何,ELM和无ELM条件下的意象评分没有显著差异。与无ELM条件相比,第二阶段唤醒后15秒的脑电图(EEG)觉醒平均量在ELM条件下显著更高。此外,在第二阶段ELM条件下,与无意象报告相比,报告视觉意象时的EEG觉醒显著更高;这表明在第二阶段ELM条件下观察到的意象报告增加可能是由大脑唤醒水平介导的。这种唤醒可能为关注和回忆非快速眼动睡眠中的先前心理活动提供了更好的条件。然而,在REM睡眠中没有ELM/唤醒效应,可能是因为这种状态已经处于唤醒、注意力和由此产生的梦境回忆的最大睡眠水平。