Kamiya Akihiko, Sakagami Masahiro, Hindle Michael, Byron Peter R
Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, 410 N 12th Street, P.O. Box 980533, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA.
J Pharm Sci. 2004 Jul;93(7):1828-37. doi: 10.1002/jps.20091.
The particle sizing performance of a Next Generation Pharmaceutical Impactor (NGI) was compared to that of an Andersen cascade impactor (ACI). A single lot of Vanceril MDIs containing beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) was used throughout. MDIs were sampled into NGI and ACI in accordance with USP recommendations, at 30.0 and 28.3 L/min, respectively, following 1, 2, 6, and 30 actuations with or without a silicone cup or stage coating, to determine the apparent particle size distributions (PSD) of BDP. The mass balance and the statistical comparability of drug deposits were assured on a "per actuation basis" across all experiments, demonstrating "good cascade impactor practices." Interstage deposition or "wall losses" in NGI were found to be lower than those in ACI, although their determination was laborious in NGI. The PSD profiles for Vanceril from a single actuation were distinguishable between NGI and ACI, when uncoated collection surfaces were used, most specifically for drug mass <4-microm aerodynamic diameter (p < 0.05). Silicone coating of collection surfaces and an increased number of actuations were shown to result in PSD profile shifts for both NGI and ACI. Such effects were most pronounced for NGI, although coating the collection surfaces and/or increasing the number of actuations improved drug retention significantly on the upper stages of NGI, and thereby, minimized the effects of particle bounce of BDP from Vanceril MDIs. PSD profiles from a single actuation could be determined reliably in either of these impactors, provided that coated collection surfaces were employed; also, cumulative % mass undersize profiles were similar between instruments. However, small differences in PSD profiles still existed to support NGI's design claims for reduced "overlap" in its stage collection efficiency curves.
将下一代药物撞击器(NGI)的颗粒分级性能与安德森级联撞击器(ACI)进行了比较。全程使用了一批含二丙酸倍氯米松(BDP)的万托林定量吸入气雾剂。按照美国药典的建议,在有或没有硅胶杯或级段涂层的情况下,分别进行1次、2次、6次和30次启动后,以30.0和28.3 L/min的流速将定量吸入气雾剂采样到NGI和ACI中,以确定BDP的表观粒度分布(PSD)。在所有实验中,均以“每次启动为基础”确保药物沉积的质量平衡和统计可比性,证明了“良好的级联撞击器操作规范”。尽管在NGI中确定级间沉积或“壁损失”比较费力,但发现其低于ACI中的级间沉积或“壁损失”。当使用未涂层的收集表面时,单次启动的万托林的PSD曲线在NGI和ACI之间是可区分的,最明显的是对于空气动力学直径<4微米的药物质量(p<0.05)。收集表面的硅胶涂层和增加的启动次数均显示会导致NGI和ACI的PSD曲线发生偏移。这种影响在NGI中最为明显,尽管对收集表面进行涂层和/或增加启动次数可显著提高药物在NGI上级段的保留率,从而将BDP从万托林定量吸入气雾剂中的颗粒反弹影响降至最低。只要使用涂层收集表面,在这两种撞击器中均可可靠地确定单次启动的PSD曲线;此外,仪器之间的累积%质量筛下曲线相似。然而,PSD曲线仍存在小差异,以支持NGI关于其级段收集效率曲线中减少“重叠”的设计主张。