Suppr超能文献

体外比较三种撞击器对复方干粉吸入剂制剂空气动力学沉积的影响

Aerodynamic deposition of combination dry powder inhaler formulations in vitro: a comparison of three impactors.

机构信息

King's College London, Pharmaceutical Science Division, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Pharm. 2010 Mar 30;388(1-2):40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.12.031. Epub 2009 Dec 21.

Abstract

Inertial impaction is generally regarded as the 'gold standard' for the in vitro assessment of aerodynamic deposition of inhaled formulations. Despite the availability of several impactors, few studies have compared measurements of aerodynamic deposition using multiple impactors and none employed a combination formulation. The aerodynamic deposition of the combination dry powder inhaler (DPI) Seretide Accuhaler, which contains salmeterol xinafoate (SX) and fluticasone propionate (FP), was assessed using the Andersen cascade impactor (ACI), multi-stage liquid impinger (MSLI) and next generation impactor (NGI) and the results were compared. Two Seretide products were tested at flow rates of 30 and QLmin(-1), the latter corresponding to a pressure drop of 4kPa across the device. Significant differences in the particle size distributions were observed when the same formulation was tested using various impactors. The ACI was found to be less suitable for DPI testing at flow rates considerably higher than 28.3Lmin(-1) due to the significant overlap in the cut-off curves of the pre-separator and stage 0. This was not the case with the MSLI but the data derived were limited by the relatively small number of stages. Deposition data determined by the three impactors were significantly different. The NGI produced good resolution and minimal inter-stage overlap and was regarded as the impactor of choice for DPI testing.

摘要

惯性撞击通常被认为是评估吸入制剂空气动力学沉积的“金标准”。尽管有几种撞击器可供使用,但很少有研究比较使用多种撞击器测量空气动力学沉积,也没有使用组合制剂进行研究。使用安德森级联撞击器(ACI)、多级液体撞击器(MSLI)和下一代撞击器(NGI)评估了含有沙美特罗昔萘酸酯(SX)和丙酸氟替卡松(FP)的组合干粉吸入器(DPI)Seretide Accuhaler 的空气动力学沉积,并对结果进行了比较。在 30 和 QLmin(-1) 的流速下测试了两种 Seretide 产品,后者对应于装置上 4kPa 的压降。当使用各种撞击器测试相同制剂时,观察到粒径分布存在显著差异。由于预分离器和 0 级的截止曲线有很大的重叠,ACI 不太适合在远远高于 28.3Lmin(-1) 的流速下进行 DPI 测试。MSLI 则不是这种情况,但由于阶段数量相对较少,所得数据受到限制。三个撞击器确定的沉积数据存在显著差异。NGI 产生了良好的分辨率和最小的级间重叠,被认为是 DPI 测试的首选撞击器。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验