Licciardone John C, Stoll Scott T, Cardarelli Kathryn M, Gamber Russell G, Swift Jon N, Winn William B
University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth-Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2004 May;104(5):193-202.
Preliminary study results suggest that osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) may reduce pain, improve ambulation, and increase rehabilitation efficiency in patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty.
To determine the efficacy of OMT in patients who recently underwent surgery for knee or hip osteoarthritis or for a hip fracture.
Randomized controlled trial involving hospital and postdischarge phases.
Hospital-based acute rehabilitation unit.
A total of 42 women and 18 men who were hospitalized between October 1998 and August 1999.
Patients were randomly assigned to groups that received either OMT or sham treatment in addition to standard care. Manipulation was individualized and performed according to study guidelines regarding frequency, duration, and technique.
Changes in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores and in daily analgesic use during the rehabilitation unit stay; length of stay; rehabilitation efficiency--defined as the FIM total score change per rehabilitation unit day; and changes in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 scores from rehabilitation unit admission to 4 weeks after discharge.
Of 19 primary outcome measures, the only significant difference between groups was decreased rehabilitation efficiency with OMT (2.0 vs 2.6 FIM total score points per day; P = .01). Stratified analyses demonstrated that poorer OMT outcomes were confined to patients with osteoarthritis who underwent total knee arthroplasty (length of stay, 15.0 vs 8.3 days; P = .004; rehabilitation efficiency, 2.1 vs 3.4 FIM total score points per day; P < .001).
The OMT protocol used does not appear to be efficacious in this hospital rehabilitation population.
初步研究结果表明,整骨手法治疗(OMT)可能会减轻接受膝关节或髋关节置换术患者的疼痛、改善行走能力并提高康复效率。
确定OMT对近期接受膝关节或髋关节骨关节炎手术或髋部骨折手术患者的疗效。
涉及住院期和出院后阶段的随机对照试验。
基于医院的急性康复单元。
1998年10月至1999年8月期间住院的42名女性和18名男性。
患者被随机分为两组,除标准护理外,一组接受OMT,另一组接受假治疗。手法治疗是个性化的,并根据关于频率、持续时间和技术的研究指南进行。
康复单元住院期间功能独立性测量(FIM)评分和每日镇痛药使用量的变化;住院时间;康复效率(定义为每个康复单元日FIM总分变化);以及从康复单元入院到出院后4周医学结局研究简表36评分的变化。
在19项主要观察指标中,两组之间唯一的显著差异是OMT组康复效率降低(每天FIM总分变化分别为2.0分和2.6分;P = 0.01)。分层分析表明,OMT效果较差仅限于接受全膝关节置换术的骨关节炎患者(住院时间,15.0天对8.3天;P = 0.004;康复效率,每天FIM总分变化分别为2.1分和3.4分;P < 0.001)。
在该医院康复人群中,所使用的OMT方案似乎无效。