Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, 25 Victoria Park Road, Exeter, Devon, EX2 4NT, UK.
Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Feb;30(2):285-91. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1600-6. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of osteopathy as a treatment option for musculoskeletal pain. Six databases were searched from their inception to August 2010. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were considered if they tested osteopathic manipulation/mobilization against any control intervention or no therapy in human with any musculoskeletal pain in any anatomical location, and if they assessed pain as an outcome measure. The selection of studies, data extraction, and validation were performed independently by two reviewers. Studies of chiropractic manipulations were excluded. Sixteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Their methodological quality ranged between 1 and 4 on the Jadad scale (max = 5). Five RCTs suggested that osteopathy compared to various control interventions leads to a significantly stronger reduction of musculoskeletal pain. Eleven RCTs indicated that osteopathy compared to controls generates no change in musculoskeletal pain. Collectively, these data fail to produce compelling evidence for the effectiveness of osteopathy as a treatment of musculoskeletal pain.
本次系统评价的目的是评估整骨疗法作为治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛的一种选择的有效性。从建库开始至 2010 年 8 月,我们检索了 6 个数据库。只有在针对任何解剖部位的任何肌肉骨骼疼痛,将整骨手法/松动术与任何对照干预或无治疗进行比较,并且将疼痛作为结局测量的情况下,如果为随机临床试验(RCT),才被认为是符合纳入标准的。研究的选择、数据提取和验证均由两名评审员独立进行。排除了脊椎按摩疗法的研究。16 项 RCT 符合纳入标准。其方法学质量在 Jadad 量表上的分值范围为 1 至 4 分(最高 5 分)。5 项 RCT 表明,与各种对照干预相比,整骨疗法可显著减轻肌肉骨骼疼痛。11 项 RCT 表明,与对照组相比,整骨疗法对肌肉骨骼疼痛没有变化。总的来说,这些数据未能提供令人信服的证据证明整骨疗法是治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛的有效方法。