Atzeni Thierry, Carbonnel Serge
Laboratoire de Psychologie et Neurocognition, CNRS UMR 5105, Université de Savoie, BP 1104, 73011 Chambéry Cedex, France.
Brain Cogn. 2004 Jul;55(2):237-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.004.
The majority of the models which attempt to explain category-specific deficits are based on the assumption that the conceptual knowledge is represented in a permanent way in memory (abstractive view). showed that a non-abstractive view would be more suitable to account for some of these cases. The present study aims to assess the hypotheses on the meaning evocation process as formulated by these authors, using a property verification task conducted on healthy subjects. The data were in agreement with these hypotheses and would be more hardly accounted in the frame of the abstractive view.
大多数试图解释特定类别缺陷的模型都基于这样一种假设,即概念知识以一种永久的方式存储在记忆中(抽象观点)。研究表明,一种非抽象观点可能更适合解释其中一些情况。本研究旨在通过对健康受试者进行属性验证任务,来评估这些作者提出的关于意义唤起过程的假设。数据与这些假设一致,并且在抽象观点的框架下更难得到解释。